Writer Questions Pitts’ Logic In Recent Column

» 2 Comments | Post a Comment

In answer to Leonard Pitts’ column on Oct. 14 titled “ A legal argument and common sense at the court,” Pitts quotes the part of the First Amendment: “Congress shall make no law,” but he conveniently (as do others) omits part of the remaining phrase which states “or prohibit the free exercise thereof.”
Further, in his column he states “You need only to look at Iran to know the separation of church and state is a good thing.” I am not sure how to interpret this statement.
But let me say to Mr. Pitts: If he were to attempt to practice his religion (other than Islam) in Iran, the powers that be would probably separate his head from his shoulders.
So much for his logic which to me is really the “pits,” as the old folks used to say.
Mr. Pitts, et. al., should give thanks that they live in a country that, up to now, has had freedom of religion rather than one which frees you from religion by cutting off your head.
Read: Death to all non-believers!

Sam Y. Perkins
Bristol, Va.

Advertisement

 
View More: No tags are associated with this article
Not what you're looking for? Try our quick search:
 

Advertisement

Reader Reactions

Flag Comment Posted by oldman on October 16, 2009 at 2:06 am

Why not send a letter to one of the Christian Churches in Iran and ask ?

Over 300,000 Christians in Iran ask them !

Flag Comment Posted by Mammal on October 15, 2009 at 9:59 am

So, does being a Christian MAKE you oblivious or do you have to be oblivious to BE a Christian?

Post a Comment(Requires free registration)

The commenting period has ended or commenting has been deactivated for this article.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement