Police Botched Investigation
When a journalist breaks his word to a source, he loses all credibility and ceases to be a viable prober for the truth. His career is finished. The damage is no less severe when it’s a police officer who goes back on his word.
For six weeks, a high-ranking Bristol Tennessee police officer violated an agreement with this newspaper. In doing so, he severed a sacred bond that allows reporters and bureaucrats to expose the truth, and in the process eroded those two great disinfectants, sunshine and transparency.
Capt. Charlie Thomas of the BTPD has run point on the homicide investigation involving the March 1 death of beloved local musician Jef Roberts, who was punched outside a downtown restaurant, fell and hit his head on the curb, and died a week later.
Thomas quickly told the Bristol Herald Courier on the record that the preliminary finding was that the puncher – an Army food inspector from Fort Campbell, Ky. – acted in self-defense after Roberts cursed his wife and started to throw his own punch first.
The Bristol police captain is a thoughtful man who often is at the center of some of the most controversial and compelling criminal cases in this area. But he does a lousy job of cooperating with local media and thus, a lousy job at keeping taxpayers informed. Claiming he was once burned by this newspaper in some long-ago unnamed controversy, Thomas since early March would only talk to us off the record about the Roberts case. We made a deal with Thomas – such deals are commonplace in journalism – to not print anything he told us and, in return, Thomas promised to notify the Herald Courier the instant the autopsy report arrived. That autopsy report, he said, would validate the police investigation and put to rest claims by Roberts’ friends of a police cover-up.
Thomas essentially was right about the autopsy. But he lied by keeping it from us. There’s no other way to say it.
The autopsy findings came in May 1. While we did not do a good enough job of hounding Thomas, we fully believed his pledge. It was not until another BHC reporter cornered him in his office Monday that he came clean, admitting in the process that he had violated his end of the agreement. Once an off-the-record agreement is violated, then everything Capt. Thomas told us is fair game. We no longer are bound by our agreement, and in fact, it’s incumbent upon us to expose the source who reneged.
We can’t speak for the Herald Courier of old, but this newspaper in recent years has been more than fair and kind and even magnanimous to Thomas. For example, when Thomas spearheaded the 2007 investigation into kidnap victim Heather Young by her estranged husband, Doug, we documented Thomas’ dogged investigation, which culminated with the woman’s release and husband’s arrest in Georgia. We pictured Thomas on the front page with a relieved tear in his eye.
That Thomas would allow the Jef Roberts case – a powder keg if there ever was one – to continue smoldering without revealing the conclusion of the autopsy that he himself said would validate the investigation speaks to a huge lapse in judgment, not to mention the breaking of one man’s word to another man, reporter Michael L. Owens.
Since Thomas won’t return our calls anymore – he rarely has anyway – let us fill in some of the blanks of this horrible tragedy.
Thomas told us for the initial, March 3 article: “From the witness statements that we got, Mr. Roberts initiated the confrontation, shoved the husband and then drew his fist like he was going to punch him. [Thach] was defending himself.”
During that interview, Thomas stressed that autopsy results were being awaited but made the extraordinary clumsy claim that Roberts, who suffered from leg blood clots and walked with a cane, died of unrelated medical conditions and not from hitting his head on the curb outside the restaurant. Roberts’ friends remain incredulous at the captain’s mention of “some pre-existing medical conditions. ... From what we’ve gathered,” the police captain said in the article, “the injuries that [Roberts] sustained were not life-threatening. This was just an unfortunate series of events.”
Thomas’ nonsensical conclusion has fueled a 3½-month-long controversy in which Roberts’ legion of friends has poked holes in the police investigation and defamed this newspaper for reporting the police conclusions of self-defense.
Even if those conclusions are correct, there can be little doubt that Bristol Tennessee police botched the investigation. For example, Thomas told us on the record that Thach waited 30 seconds after Roberts drew back his fist before he threw his only punch. Thomas, however, has refused to elaborate on that claim or even to reconfirm it.
Roberts’ friends also have seized on the allegation that Thach fled the scene, wasn’t questioned until hours later, never had his blood-alcohol level tested and benefited from a pro-military police department and its hometown newspaper. The last allegation is beyond ludicrous. The first appears false, but the two allegations in the middle indeed are gospel.
Here’s what Thomas told us, off the record, after our initial reports: Thach didn’t flee Machiavelli’s; he was advised by a restaurant owner to leave before Roberts’ friends could tear him to pieces. He calmly walked to his vehicle and returned to the Courtyard by Marriott, seven miles inside the commonwealth of Virginia. He did not flee the scene of a crime, as Roberts’ friends claim.
Why police waited three hours to question him is the police department’s fault, not Thach’s, who Roberts said returned to Machiavelli’s once earlier and called several times just to express concerns over Roberts’ condition. That does not sound like a blood-thirsty killer.
Thach willingly agreed to follow police back into Tennessee to be questioned – albeit three hours later – and had his account supported by several family witnesses and one of Machiavelli’s co-owners, Thomas told us off the record. The co-owner of the business, however, has been telling Roberts’ friends that Thach was the aggressor – an account that Thomas has denied.
Here’s what can’t be disputed and is proven in the autopsy report: Roberts was 3½ times the legal limit for driving under the influence of alcohol (he was not driving) – with a blood-alcohol level of .274. There can be no doubt that Roberts suffered from blood clots in his leg and needed a cane to walk, according to his friends. It’s also obvious that Roberts, at nearly 330 pounds, according to the autopsy, did not fall because of one punch from a man half his size but because of a combination of the punch, his medical condition and his inebriation. There also can be no doubt that Roberts had a huge problem with alcohol – six prior alcohol-related arrests.
The problem with this case is that even if police are correct and Thach is telling the truth, police have aided and abetted conspiracy theories by failing to timely question Thach. The allegation that police waited too long to take Thach’s blood-alcohol level is a red herring, however. Having alcohol in your system is not a crime; driving at the time is. Absent evidence of that, police had no probable cause to even test Thach’s blood-alcohol level.
Further fueling claims of a shoddy police investigation are this fact: Only one person – Police Officer Mike McCoy – testified May 27 before the secret grand jury, according to District Attorney H. Greeley Wells. Why wasn’t Thach called to testify? Essentially, one police officer was called to restate the premature conclusion already arrived at by his investigation four months earlier.
Thomas then poured diesel on this PR fire by practicing medicine without a license and speculating that a head blow to a curb didn’t kill Roberts.
Roberts’ friends, meanwhile, have martyred a man who by many accounts was inspirational and sweet as long as he stayed sober. But any objective source familiar with the downtown party scene will tell you that once fueled by alcohol, Roberts became belligerent. The police allegation that Roberts cursed Thach’s wife is certainly believable given Roberts’ level of intoxication.
No one wins with this case. Roberts is dead and his mother is left forever grief-stricken. Roberts’ hundreds, maybe thousands, of friends are angry and lashing out at whatever target wanders by – be it police, this newspaper, Thach, his family and anonymous strangers who disagree with them in response to articles posted on our Web site, TriCities.com. Some of Roberts’ friends have even reduced themselves to criticizing the physical appearance of our reporters, whose photos accompany online articles.
We understand the pain they are enduring. And we sincerely wish that the first article on this tragedy had been published right after the incident but while Roberts was still alive, albeit hospitalized in a coma. That first article would have been built around the huge outpouring of love and support that overflowed the hospital intensive care unit.
Alas, we didn’t learn of this story until after his death. If the incident were such an outrageous miscarriage of justice and police incompetence at the time, why weren’t we called during the week following the incident? It would not have changed the story ultimately, but it might have tempered Roberts’ friends outrage by revealing his true gentle-while-sober character and how much he was loved as a man and respected as a musician.
Meanwhile, Bristol Tennessee police behaved more like the Keystone Cops on this case.
Advertisement
Reader Reactions
I can’t believe this is still going on??
I think you should ALL be ashamed of yourselves.
I hope his Mother never has, or happens to read all this CRAP.
It seems everyone has forgotten that there are human beings involved.
This guy you continue to lambast, and paint pictures of, regardless of what color they are…had a family. And I know for a fact, some of them read this.
I signed the petition, I knew Jef for the better part of 20 years.
I’ve seldomed posted on here, because it’s a bunch of adults, who obviously don’t have anything better to do than sling mud, like children. Grow up.
Let the man, family, friends have some form of peace.
Thank you Allen, you made my point. A fist fight, especially a one shove/one punch fight, would not meet either of the criteria needed to charge someone with either of those crimes.
At best you may have an assault, but a defense to that is you feel threatened. You don’t have to be actually struck before being able to claim this as a defense, you just have to articulate you felt threatened of being assaulted.
A normal fist fight does not, albeit ending tragically, will not rise to the level of either of the crimes you have cited.
The Grand Jury is made of of registered voters in the county, persons like you and me, who are given the facts of the crime at which point they decide if it meets the probable cause requirements for whatever is being charged. It’s not some great conspiracy, it’s normal people, who have decided this was a case of self defense. Not the police, not the District Attorney’s Office, everyday taxpayers.
It may not satisfy you, but it’s the system we live under. Remember Thac is innocent until proven guilty, not the other way around.
I posted a comment yesterday criticizing the complaint by the author that the Police department didn’t “keep his word” and that he should have followed up. They deleted my comment from this thread. Interesting use of free speech.
Mr. Brown:
Neither reckless homicide or voluntary manslaughter fit the facts of this crime. Reckless homicide requires a reckless act with a substantial risk of death. A fist fight does not pose a substantial risk of death. Drag racing at 120 MPH yes, fist fight no.
Voluntary manslaughter requires a knowing (or intentional) killing. Even you have said you don’t think Thach intended to kill Jef.
Again, you keep making absolute statements about what David Jun may or may not have said to the police. I ask again: Have you seen a copy of the statement he gave the police? If the answer to that is no, then you have no way of knowing what he told them and what he didn’t. Maybe the reason they kept calling him back was because people who purport to know him keep posting that he said one thing when in actuality he told the police something else?
If you have spoken with him, tell us exactly what he said happened. I would be very interested to hear a narrative telling of what happened that night from someone that was actually there!
As for the petition:
I have no doubt Jef had lots of friends. Have any of them gone to see the DA? Have the written a letter to anybody? Wait, yes they did. What happened as a result? Well the police investigated the case, they present it to the DA and then the grand jury. That is just exactly what the petition asked for.
As for not repeatedly signing the petition, no duh, I was saying there is a conspicuous lack of posters on this forum. If all those “thousands” that bunnyhugger speaks of are truly out there, why aren’t we hearing their voice? I googled, yahooed and binged Jef’s name. I found his MySpace page, the few posts on Topix, links to a few newspaper articles, the petition site, but no active discussion about this case other than this blog. Maybe I’m just looking in the wrong place.
Then again, maybe people have realized that there is no conspiracy, that Duc Thach really did act in self-defense and the grand jury made the right decision. Jef’s death was a tragedy. Prosecuting an innocent man only compounds that tragedy.
Again, this was a wedding reception. I was not there, so I can’t say who did or did not serve anyone anything. I was never told by either owner that they served Jef anything. I would disagree though that this is the most critical issue as Jef was killed by Duc Thach’s actions, not by how much he may have had to drink.
Allen,
Still no one has responded to my call about the criminal negligence involved in allowing Jef to drink to a .274 BAC. Why is no one addressing this, the most critical issue? I suspect Thach was legally drunk as well. If this truly was the case, then the owners of Machiavelli’s are playing both sides off as fools while avoiding criminal prosecution and civil liabilities. Who served the booze? AllenBrown would you please let us know. Please!
(HomeyDClown) (oh, man.)
I never claimed to be a lawyer but since you asked:
For…....(HomeyDclown). You shouldn’t use acronyms like TCA(Tennessee Code Annotated) if you want your opinion to be understood by everyone else
Tennessee Code Annotated § 39-13-215 defines Reckless Homicide as the reckless killing of another person.
Reckless Homicide:
In order to be found guilty of Reckless Homicide, the State of Tennessee must prove each of the following elements beyond a reasonable doubt:
(1) That the defendant killed the alleged victim;
and
(2) That the defendant acted recklessly, i.e., the defendant was aware of, but consciously disregarded, a substantial and unjustifiable risk that the alleged victim would be killed. The risk must be of such a nature and degree that its disregard constitutes a gross deviation from the standard of care that an ordinary person would exercise under all the circumstances as viewed from the defendant’s standpoint.
The requirement of “recklessly” is established if it is shown that the defendant acted either intentionally or knowingly.
Or, maybe this one:
39-13-211. Voluntary manslaughter. —
(a) Voluntary manslaughter is the intentional or knowing killing of another in a state of passion produced by adequate provocation sufficient to lead a reasonable person to act in an irrational manner.
(b) Voluntary manslaughter is a Class C felony.
[Acts 1989, ch. 591, § 1; T.C.A., § 39-13-207; Acts 1990, ch. 1038, § 4.]
As for explaining the relation between intent and homicide:
general intent:intent to perform an illegal act without the desire for further consequences or a precise result there was a general intent to assault but not to kill.
And the rules regarding grand juries:
Who May Be Present.
(1) While the Grand Jury Is in Session. The following persons may be present while the grand jury is in session: attorneys for the government, the witness being questioned, interpreters when needed, and a court reporter or an operator of a recording device.
(2) During Deliberations and Voting. No person other than the jurors, and any interpreter needed to assist a hearing-impaired or speech-impaired juror, may be present while the grand jury is deliberating or voting.
Also:
(e) Recording and Disclosing the Proceedings.
(1) Recording the Proceedings. Except while the grand jury is deliberating or voting, all proceedings must be recorded by a court reporter or by a suitable recording device. But the validity of a prosecution is not affected by the unintentional failure to make a recording. Unless the court orders otherwise, an attorney for the government will retain control of the recording, the reporter’s notes, and any transcript prepared from those notes.
(2) Secrecy.
(A) No obligation of secrecy may be imposed on any person except in accordance with Rule 6 (e)(2)(B).
(B) Unless these rules provide otherwise, the following persons must not disclose a matter occurring before the grand jury:
(i) a grand juror;
(ii) an interpreter;
(iii) a court reporter;
(iv) an operator of a recording device;
(v) a person who transcribes recorded testimony;
(vi) an attorney for the government; or
(vii) a person to whom disclosure is made under Rule 6 (e)(3)(A)(ii) or (iii).
So you, me, Mr. Foster, or anyone else not on that list can’t attend a grand jury hearing. Doesn’t sound like an open door policy does it?
Also, I don’t care how long you say you have known Capt. Charlie Thomas. It’s the fact that he never mentioned an autopsy report he claimed would validate his investigation that casts doubt on his investigative confidence. It’s the calling an eyewitness back twice to give the same statement Thomas claimed “corroborated” his premature conclusion the night of the incident that casts doubt on his claims. Why would he need an eyewitness, who’s statement Capt. Thomas felt matched Duc Thach’s statement so closely, to tell his story three times over an extended period of time? Was he or any other investigating officer hoping that Mr. Jun might miss a detail a month after the incident that was fresh in his memory when he gave his first statement? Were the investigating officers trying to discredit Mr. Jun’s original statement or were they just wanting to be really, really, sure?
Well?
Itsme123, the things you say in your post show that the only information you have is drawn from this website.
It is a much bigger world than just what you may read in the posts on tricities.com.
You said “People can quickly be drawn to an incident. Things like this attract Internet types like lights attract moths. Problem is, most of them forgot about it fifteen minutes after they signed the petition. Otherwise they would be on here, posting just like us. They don’t have to read the paper to post, and if they truly were concerned about Jef’s case they would be keeping up with it.“
Well, I am one of those people who signed the petition over 3 months ago and I haven’t forgotten. That petition isn’t something you go back to every day.
It is meant to be signed only once. Common sense should tell you if you see someones name signed 3 months ago you wont see it again after that. Its a petition, for Gods sake?!! wth?
Just because those people signed that petition when this travesty first happened doesn’t mean they have forgotten about it.
Obviously a very large part of the public hasn’t forgotten about it. There has already been one benefit held in Bristol where countless people turned out to help raise funds to help his mother cope with the medical bills (that Thach should have been responsible for) and there is yet another one in the works. I would venture to say most of those people signed that petition over 3 months ago but have they forgotten? Surely not, they haven’t.
There are websites where posts pile up daily about what happened.
I was in Ruby Tuesdays just yesterday and heard a group of strangers talking about the insanity of Thach getting off scott free. I doubt if those people posted on here either.
Like I said itsme123, It is a much bigger world than what you see here in these posts and make no mistake, theres still an army of Justice for Jef supporters out there.
You people are funny, I didn’t realize Bristol had so many lawyers. I would like to retain a couple of you so the next time I get drunk in public and actafool, I can be exonerated of any wrongdoing in the court of public opinion. If you don’t mind, please back up some of your statements with law, specifically T.C.A. not from NYPD Blue, or better yet, CSI:Miami.
What is the T.C.A for:
Leaving the scene of a crime (not related to a traffic accident)
The ability for the police to just test your BAC whenever they feel like it (not related to a traffic accident)
And better yet, one of you lawyers explain the nexus between intent and what its role is in charging someone with homicide. It is obvious to me that is was Thac’s intent to kill Jef since he punched him and left, instead of hanging around to pummel him while he lay on the ground.
I know these are simple little things for someone as smart as some of you here, but please help the rest of us understand.
Oh, J.Todd, wonder if the District Attorney told Capt. Thomas to withhold the report until the Grand Jury, which is not ‘secret’ by the way. I know you think the so called ‘news’ is a higher calling, but I’m sure Capt. Thomas did what he thought was morally right in this case. I have known Capt. Thomas for several years and his work in the community, he is a upstanding man, however I do find it incredulous that he would withhold something so vital as a report, available through the Freedom of Information Act, from you. He should be tarred and feathered for such an act (sarcasm).
To all, have a great day.


Advertisement