Palin Not Well Vetted

» 22 Comments | Post a Comment

Sen. John McCain energized his campaign by choosing a young, solidly pro-life vice presidential nominee and the first woman ever on the Republican ticket. In addition to closing the enthusiasm gap with Democratic nominee Barack Obama, he also accomplished in one quick decision what he has been unable to do in more than 18 months: win over the GOP’s most conservative wing.

But the optimum word here is “quick.”

Amid questions raised over Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin’s level of experience and new personal and familial revelations trickling out every day, it has become clear that Palin was not vetted properly.

In fact, a McCain team didn’t even arrive in Alaska to investigate Palin’s background until Thursday, the day she accepted the running mate offer and a day before she was introduced to the nation and world as McCain’s VP selection.

The New York Times also reports that McCain’s campaign is sending operatives back to Alaska to further vet the governor. It’s a little late for that.
Palin is under investigation by the Alaska legislature over allegations she abused her power and fired the state’s public safety commissioner because he would not fire her ex-brother-in-law. On Monday, Palin announced that her 17-year-old daughter, Bristol, was five months pregnant. Word also got out that Palin’s husband has a DUI charge, although it’s 22 years old.

These revelations singularly are not career-enders, nor should they be. They say nothing about Palin’s fitness to be one heartbeat away from the presidency of the United States. But they say a lot about McCain’s judgment in picking a running mate without a thorough background check. (McCain claims he knew about the teenage daughter’s pregnancy, but it’s not clear how or when he became known of it.)

It’s not what has been learned already about Palin that is problematic for McCain, but the unknown – and the constant risk to McCain’s newfound momentum.

McCain’s VP pick also smacks of pandering – hardly the trait of a self-styled maverick. Campaign insiders have said the Arizona senator really wanted as a running mate former Homeland Security chief Tom Ridge, a Republican, or Sen. Joseph Lieberman, an independent but longtime Democrat.
This dilemma presented a Sophie’s choice for McCain: Pick the pro-choice Ridge or Lieberman and attract the support of moderates and independents, or risk the evangelical vote on Nov. 4. It very likely will take both to win Nov. 4.

Instead, McCain assuaged evangelicals by selecting an unknown with less than two years in the governor’s mansion of an obscure state, and two years removed from the mayor’s office in a town of 6,700.

Supporters claim the Palin selection will appeal to disenchanted Hillary Clinton supporters, but that assertion is downright silly. Palin holds diametrically opposed views than Clinton on everything from abortion to global warming. To think that Clinton supporters will punish Obama by abandoning their principles is an affront to these women.

We are not knocking Palin, but we are questioning the process in which she was chosen. The Alaska governor might possess the stuff of political greatness, but she should not have been selected on the GOP ticket after a single, 15-minute-long, face-to-face meeting with McCain.

The last time a VP selection was this unvetted was Sen. Thomas Eagleton in 1972. He lasted for 18 days on George McGovern’s Democratic ticket before being pushed aside following revelations that he three times had been hospitalized for depression and twice received electroshock therapy.

Contrary to the stigma, there’s no shame in being treated for depression – it’s admirable, in fact. The shame is that McGovern operatives didn’t know about it until after he was on the ticket.

And the shame here is that McCain rushed a veepee pick who may not be ready for prime time and for whom there might be other surprises.

Advertisement

 
View More: No tags are associated with this article
Not what you're looking for? Try our quick search:
 

Advertisement

Reader Reactions

Flag Comment Posted by commonsense on September 04, 2008 at 3:03 pm

Captainkona-
I sure hope you don’t have a daughter…
Do you?
D

Flag Comment Posted by commonsense on September 04, 2008 at 2:37 pm

Not well vetted?
Seems to me the Board here and the media in general is making this claim because they think they hold the explicit right to do the vetting for everyone.
Fact is, too many of our politicians don’t have the moral character, discipline or integrity to pass a truly effective vetting process.
Why, just a few short months ago you were touting John Edwards—weren’t you???

...and Barack- no thank you!

Flag Comment Posted by captainkona on September 03, 2008 at 10:54 am

I suspect that Sara Barracuda, and her alcohol guzzling, floosie daughter are about as qualified to be VP as you are, JimFred.

:D :D

Flag Comment Posted by captainkona on September 03, 2008 at 10:50 am

Hey, Carl!
Get your embedded tags right.

“Hey Barack, how many employees does Alaska have?“

Counting the ones Sara Barracuda used her authority to have fired in violation of ethics laws and is being investigated for as we speak?
Why would Obama know that? Why is it important? Why do you parrot Rush Limpballs like he was god?

LOL

Sara Palin is a dingbat that didn’t even know what the VPs duties entail.
McLame/Falin ‘08!!!!!

Flag Comment Posted by JimFred on September 03, 2008 at 8:28 am

Palin is well qualified to be VP or President. The Dems are grabbing at straws because they are worried that the Republican ticket is looking better every day. Palin has more experience in her trigger finger than Obama has in his entire body. McCain/Palin is the best choice to lead this Nation. The fact is that Bristol Palin is not running for any public office and should not be an issue.

Flag Comment Posted by carl on September 03, 2008 at 7:04 am

While Mr Palin recieved a DUI 22 years ago, Obama was on cocaine and smoking pot. Which one is running for president?
I congratulate the daughter on her upcoming nuptials and birth of her child. The BHC board must be like Obama and believe a child is punishment in stead of a blessing.
<object width=“425” height=“344”></param></param><embed src=“http://www.youtube.com/v/GbZJYWjkAPo&hl=en&fs=1&color1=0x3a3a3a&color2=0x999999” type=“application/x-shockwave-flash” allowfullscreen=“true” width=“425” height=“344”></embed></object>
That’s right, Obama says a baby is PUNISHMENT.
Lets talk expirience.
“My understanding is that Gov. Palin’s town, Wassilla, has I think 50 employees. We’ve got 2500 in this campaign. I think their budget is maybe 12 million dollars a year – we have a budget of about three times that just for the month,” Obama responded to CNN .

Hey Barack, how many employees does Alaska have?
Hey Barack, what is the budget of Alaska?
Hey Barack, how many employees did you have in 2006, when Sarah Palin was first elected governor of Alaska?
Hey Barack, how big was your budget in 2006, when Sarah Palin was first elected governor of Alaska?
Hey Barack, back in 1996, when Sarah Palin was elected Mayor,how many employees did you have?
Hey Barack, back in 1996, when Sarah Palin was elected Mayor, what was your community organizer budget?
Hey Barack, back in 1992, when Sarah Palin was first elected to city council, how many employees did you have?
Hey Barack, back in 1992, when Sarah Palin was first elected to city council, what was your community organizer budget?

Post a Comment(Requires free registration)

The commenting period has ended or commenting has been deactivated for this article.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement