Obama Aims to Tip Virginia Democratic

» 10 Comments | Post a Comment

Southwest Virginia has to feel special, being actively courted by Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama. He kicked off his campaign in Bristol earlier this summer, then returns to the region today to visit Lebanon, a place gaining notoriety as a growing technology center.

Obama surely got a map to Lebanon from former Gov. Mark Warner, who mentioned the tiny town in his speech to the Democratic National Convention last month. Warner shared it as a success story in Virginia.

For locals who once knew they would leave the region for education and work, they now are getting lucrative job offers from firms like Northrop Grumman and CGI, two high-tech firms that have been lured there.

In May, state officials joined an open house for the Southwest Virginia Technology Development Center, the centerpiece of technology in Russell County. It was highlighted during Warner’s speech to the DNC, an example of how small towns can grow their own jobs and security.

And Virginia is as important in this election as it has ever been. Longtime Virginia political analyst Larry Sabato operates the Center for Politics, which also manages “crystalball,” the political prediction site (http://www.centerforpolitics.org/crystalball).

The site is calling Virginia, and its 13 electoral votes, “leaning” for Republican presidential candidate John McCain, or “currently tilting to one side, but reversible.”

Obama wants those electoral votes and isn’t being shy about visiting the Old Dominion, especially Southwest Virginia, where he will have a harder fight.
He’s also made several trips to Northern Virginia and Hampton Roads.

Virginia is one of four “McCain leaning” states, along with Missouri, North Carolina and Florida, according to Sabato. Together, they account for 66 total electoral votes.

“McCain will have to work hard to hold these four usually Republican states,” the site states. “If he loses even one of them, he will be up against the Electoral College wall. His margins in all are currently weak to nonexistent. In leaning them to McCain, we are simply assuming that the voters’ history of going GOP in presidential years might enable McCain to pull a win out narrowly.

“Watch these states closely,” the site states. “If McCain secures them by mid-September, he has a shot at a November upset. If a wide variety of polls – not just one – shows Obama even or ahead in one or two of the states with only six weeks to go, then McCain is in considerable trouble.

“Amazingly, given the fact that the Old Dominion has voted Democratic exactly once (1964) in the past 14 presidential elections, Virginia may be the shakiest of the four for McCain, though Florida is also tight,” the site says. “Thanks to dramatic population growth in Northern Virginia and university communities, this is not your father’s Virginia. It’s a Mid-Atlantic state rather than a Southern state.”

And instead of assuming that supporters in Hampton Roads and Northern Virginia will carry him, Obama is working hard to appeal to voters in this region, too. This will be a tougher crowd to win on Election Day, but he deserves credit for making the trips to the region to try to win the votes.

And it’s an especially good thing for a potential future president to see how one Virginia town turned its economy around.

Advertisement

 
View More: No tags are associated with this article
Not what you're looking for? Try our quick search:
 

Advertisement

Reader Reactions

Flag Comment Posted by dadw5boys on September 13, 2008 at 12:03 pm

John McCain’s campaign is sending out
FAULTY ABSENTEE VOTER REGISTRATION FORMS.

So far voters in Ohio, Virginia, and New Mexico have received them.

They may be trying to have you dropped from the voter registration list (i.e. “caging”),
but they are definitely trying to cause confusion with Democratic voters.

There is no evidence that the McCain campaign is sending absentee ballots to Republican voters.

If you get one…DON’T USE IT!

YOU SHOULD HANG ON TO IT, IT MAY BE USABLE AS EVIDENCE of ELECTION FRAUD

Flag Comment Posted by captainkona on September 10, 2008 at 4:24 pm

CS

Put down the crack pipe for a second and let me know if this “why?“ of yours is intended for the original article or me.

Thx.

Actually, in the interests of saving time and space, I’ll treat it like it was for me and answer.

Ever read my blog, CS? Every thing you want to know is there.
Enjoy.

Ablogination: The Murder of Appalachia

Flag Comment Posted by commonsense on September 10, 2008 at 12:54 pm

Why?

Flag Comment Posted by mvymvy on September 10, 2008 at 12:26 pm

This year West Virginia is getting some attention.

Under the current system of electing the President, presidential candidates concentrate their attention on only a handful of closely divided “battleground” states.  In 2004 two-thirds of the visits and money were focused in just six states; 88% on 9 states, and 99% of the money went to just 16 states. Two-thirds of the states and people were merely spectators to the presidential election.  Candidates have no reason to poll, visit, advertise, organize, campaign, or worry about the voter concerns in states where they are safely ahead or hopelessly behind. The reason for this is the winner-take-all rule under which all of a state’s electoral votes are awarded to the candidate who gets the most votes in each separate state.

Under the current system, a candidate can win the Presidency without winning the most popular votes nationwide.

The National Popular Vote bill would guarantee the Presidency to the candidate who receives the most popular votes in all 50 states (and DC).

Every vote would be politically relevant and equal in every presidential election.

The bill would take effect only when enacted, in identical form, by states possessing a majority of the electoral votes—that is, enough electoral votes to elect a President (270 of 538). When the bill comes into effect, all the electoral votes from those states would be awarded to the presidential candidate who receives the most popular votes in all 50 states (and DC).

The National Popular Vote bill has passed 21 state legislative chambers, including one house in Arkansas, Colorado, Maine, North Carolina, and Washington, and both houses in California, Hawaii, Illinois, New Jersey, Maryland, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, and Vermont. The bill has been enacted by Hawaii, Illinois, New Jersey, and Maryland. These four states possess 50 electoral votes — 19% of the 270 necessary to bring the law into effect.

See http://www.NationalPopularVote.com

susan

Flag Comment Posted by captainkona on September 10, 2008 at 12:14 pm

CS:

Of course I am. Surely you would have guessed that.

Flag Comment Posted by commonsense on September 10, 2008 at 11:41 am

Captainkona
Are you against Mountain top Mining?

Flag Comment Posted by dadw5boys on September 10, 2008 at 7:36 am

OBAMA / BIDEN 2008

Obama and Biden don’t have to attack Palin !!!
McCain sure made a stupid decision for his V.P. a power hungery DIVA.

The Media finds the truth that she would sacrifice her family for position and power !!!


http://www.nationalenquirer.com/_palin_family_shockers_what_sarahs_really_hiding/celebrity/65407

Flag Comment Posted by captainkona on September 09, 2008 at 10:09 pm

I think it speaks well to Obama’s campaign that he actually cares about the Southern voter. Virginia is a state that Republicans often take for granted and Democrats don’t feel motivated to try to build a following in.

Obama’s message is simple, Virginia, and the Southern States matter.

Obama will show the Appalachian area some long overdue justice. His stance against Mountain Top Removal mining (MTR) proves that.
With McLame, we will continue to be the corporate resource colony we’ve been for the last eight years.

Flag Comment Posted by chipmunk on September 09, 2008 at 6:57 pm

As for all those lucartive jobsyou refer to, perhaps you need to see what the majority of those employees at CGI & NG really make.  From what I hear, only the top dogs (supervisors) make the big bucks ($50,000), and some are only in the low $20,000.  Check it out and report back.

Flag Comment Posted by commonsense on September 09, 2008 at 7:19 am

BHCEB-
Very good article, full of facts probably valid, but where’s the EB opinion?
I sure wish BHC would help us ferret out the issues.
Thank you.

Post a Comment(Requires free registration)

The commenting period has ended or commenting has been deactivated for this article.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement