Does God expect us to care for others?
By James Swanson
On a Friday in May, at about 1:30 a.m., I began to experience excruciating pain in my stomach. My wife, Delphine, rushed me to the hospital. After several tests, the doctors determined I needed surgery to remove an infected gall bladder. My stay in the hospital lasted a little less than 48 hours.
A few weeks later, I received an alarming bill for my treatment. The invoice was accompanied with a letter stating I should not send money until the insurance company paid its portion of the charges. The bill was so high, I don’t know what I would have done without health insurance.
I couldn’t help but wonder what a person without insurance or other means to pay would have done. The hospital bill could have bankrupted most middle-class families. I shudder to think what a person receiving minimum wages would have been forced to do. I have since learned that 80 percent of all bankruptcy cases filed in Tennessee are related to medical bills. I believe that many of these bankruptcies were not filed by the unemployed, but people who were good, decent hardworking people prior to their health problems.
I have seen and heard all the talking heads in this health care debate. I know that by writing this column, I will make some readers mad, while others will cheer. My point here is not political but theological. I ask myself: Why would God want me to be concerned about health care? The response that comes to me is the story of Cain and Abel.
Remember that after Cain killed his brother, God appeared to Cain and asked, “Where is your brother Abel?” Cain’s response was, “I don’t know. Am I my brother’s keeper?” God replied to Cain, “What have you done?”
I know the politicians are debating the affordability of health care, but my debate has to do with Cain’s reply: “Am I my brother’s keeper?” In other words, does God expect me to care for my brothers and sisters?
At some point, Congress will make a health care decision primarily based on cost, political expediency and compromise. I don’t have that luxury. Whatever our representatives and senators do, it won’t be enough to help everyone, and even if it is, I still believe God calls me to care for others. I still believe that my caring must become action.
Matthew 14:14 says, “And Jesus went forth, and saw a great multitude, and was moved with compassion toward them, and he healed their sick.” When I read the prayer that Jesus taught his disciples to pray, this part speaks to me: “Thy Kingdom come, thy will be done in earth, as it is in heaven.” I hear this as a call for us – blood-washed, forgiven, and set-free people – to do all we can to make earth a reflection of heaven.
The Church cannot escape our call to go to the pool and find the man who has been there for 38 long years and offer healing to him. The Church cannot avoid its responsibility to care for the bent-over woman, the crippled, the lame, and the man beaten, robbed and left to die on the Jericho Road. So, let the politicians have their debate. I am told that the current health care legislation is more than 900 pages long, and even if the bill passes in its current state, more than 27 million people will still be left without health insurance.
I know health care reform is a process filled with difficult decisions, yet as Disciples of Christ we cannot ignore our brothers and sisters who need health care. Now as we approach the final stages of crafting a solution, we must remember the moral imperatives that undergird this effort. We must not be swayed from our course by voices saying the struggle is too great or that the status quo is OK. We must reject voices who declare that some of our brothers and sisters have been judged as unworthy of health care by the free market.
As we make decisions about financing in this difficult economic time we remember the oft repeated phrase: the budget is a moral document. It declares our priorities louder than our rhetoric. What will be our priorities? Supporting health care for children, working parents, small businesses and the least among us, or corporate tax subsidies? We know the importance of being faithful stewards of our national wealth. We must not forget that we are also stewards of our moral wealth.
I trust that as a citizen you will follow the debate, but when the dust has settled, the Church must find a way to work the works of He who has sent us.
James Swanson is bishop of the Holston Conference of the United Methodist Church, which includes Bristol, other parts of southwest Virginia and Tennessee.
Advertisement
Reader Reactions
kdr1, One way to determine if goods and servioces are overpriced is to set a standard that a hospital cannot charge more than 1-1/2 times what that same thing would cost at a store. This wopuild allow for discrepancies in their smaller buying power as opposed to what Walmart can get in large volume. That would be a good starting point. I’m not really sure we need to get that detailed here. Everyone knows that medical costs are up greater than standard inflationary prices. Why? becasue with health insurance they have been allowed to increase the cost of things. I still maintain the answer is to move away from insurance to a cash based incentive and let competition and word of mouth testamonials speak for the health care providers.
Two feathers wrote “If services were fairly priced, everyone could likely afford health care and we wouldnt be debating this issue now.“
I would agree with your first comments, but what would be a fair price for medical services? Who should decide those fair prices? I believe that is where the problem comes from.Should the government decide what prices should be?
The good Bishop actually identified the problem with health care and why it is such a problem, the hyper-inflated costs.
I can imagine the Bishop’s bill being tens of thousands of dollars for this simple surgery. I can imagine too, if his bill were itemized, he might see 100 dollar tylenol, 10,000 dollar a day room charge, surgical supplies that were no more than disposable items that actually cost the hospital a few bucks but reflect many thousands of dollars on his bill.
This is called GREED, there is no other word to use. All hospitals engage in it and NO ONE seems to see it.
It is shameful.
If services were fairly priced, everyone could likely afford health care and we wouldnt be debating this issue now.
One day all those who wirte people off saying there are programs out there to help them will get to experience those programs where Doctors do little more than put on a bandaide and give you a pill.
If I read these Crony Capitalist correctly they will crash the economy soon and all those comfortable now in thier own little world and know it all with have a very rude awakening.
Just like the Bible they seek to rewrite to make excessive profits and financial facisim moral you will get to see the dark side close up.
James Swanson,
Jesus certainly calls us to be compassionate and most of all giving. Christ came to seek that which is lost. Trying to link government health insurance to Christianity is a little disingenuous. Christ was calling Christians to service to spread the gospel, not the government to give us health insurance.
James Swanson wrote “We must reject voices who declare that some of our brothers and sisters have been judged as unworthy of health care by the free market.“
I have never seen anyone declare people “unworthy of healthcare”. As you well know there are already benefits set up for the poor to get healthcare; what you are talking about is health insurance.
I agree with Mr. Cottrill, government is not where our solution is found. The church should be the leaders in helping the sick, the poor, the orphaned. We have all these among us and yet we pass on the other side of the street as if to say, “let the gov’t handle it.“ The president and other gov’t officials are not our moral leaders, pastors are. How can we expect them to produce “moral documents”? The church needs to rise up and help the sick (uninsured), the poor (unemployed), and the widows & orphans (single-parent homes). It is our mandate. If we are to be the body of Christ, we must do what he has commanded US to do, not cheer the gov’t in its efforts.
I agree with Bishop Swanson’s assessment that God wants us to be our brother’s keeper. Where I disagree is in his interptretation that Jesus would have said that this translates into letting the government do the work. No where in scripture does God tell people to abdicate their own responsibility to let others do the job for them, and that is exactly what the government option in this health care debate is. Liberals always want to take money from others to pay for the poor, instead of putting their own money where their mouth and sacrificing their own wealth to take care of the poor. The Good Samaritan didn’t go looking for the government to care for the injured traveler and neither should we. Conservatives frequently don’t want to contribute either. The problem as I see it, is that we have allowed the health care system to get so expensive because we have sat back and let hospitals and insurance companies set a high cost standard, rather than demand a competitve rate for the services they provide. The solution, again as I see it, is to return to a system where more people pay cash for their health care and demand a discount for doing so. If they have difficulty paying for the cost of their care, private organizations like the church should step in and help, especially for their own parishoners, but also for the poor outside of their midst. The United Methodists are pretty flush with cash, Bishop Swanson, as are the Roman Catholics, et. al. What better way to testify to the gospel of Jesus Christ than to care for the poor yourselves rather than foist it off on the government?
Post a Comment(Requires free registration)
- Please avoid offensive, vulgar, or hateful language.
- Respect others.
- Use the "Flag Comment" link when necessary.
- See the Terms and Conditions for details.


Advertisement