Voting Is Society’s Most Important Civil Ritual
By Charles W. Sydnor Jr.
I voted early Nov. 4 in Saltville, Va. Going in, I noticed an elderly gentleman, shabbily dressed, feeble and barely able to walk, assisted into the polls by family members. The image was a reminder that, on this day, the will and weight of the poorest and weakest among us carries the force and power of equality that, in a simple act, neutralizes in perfect balance the influence and advantage of the richest and most privileged in our midst.
Voting is the most important ritual in the civic liturgy of the Republic, our great secular political order that itself is part of the larger, older miracle of free government, freely chosen by a free people. Sometimes, but not always, the ritual keeps faith with the miracle. On those occasions when people vote after arming themselves with the power of knowledge, that power, according to James Madison, alone guarantees liberty and forever will govern ignorance.
In past elections, ignorance,
half-truths, rank fabrications and chicaneries foisted by the politically unscrupulous have propelled into high office men of dubious character and fitness.
That was not the case in the last election. In fact, I believe Barack Obama is a leader in whom the portents of greatness reside – a public figure whose life is a self-conscious response to the beckoning of destiny, a man who may redeem the Republic from the depths of our malaise as Lincoln and FDR did in the two previous comparable catharses.
Obama, as Gen. Colin Powell noted, is a transformational figure in American history. Here’s why.
First, Obama has thought deeply about the most serious problems facing the country. With the assistance of wise and good men and women of differing political persuasions, he has developed thoughtful and sensible proposals with which to try to solve these problems: the war in Iraq; the deteriorating situation in Afghanistan; the dilemmas of al-Qaeda, Iran and North Korea; our relations with our old, traditional allies, and with the newly emergent states of Eastern Europe; the current financial crisis; the national mess in health care; America’s energy and environmental issues; and the crumbling national infrastructure that threatens literally to collapse beneath our systems of transportation, communications and sanitation.
Second, he speaks with a natural eloquence that inspires and energizes those of open mind who listen. The syntax, cadences, orotund phrases in his mastery of the language, and the pitch and tones of his soaring deliveries are not only reminiscent of John F. Kennedy, but also recall the eloquence of the two greatest leaders of the last century – Franklin Roosevelt and Winston Churchill.
In the bilious twaddle spewed by the McCain campaign, Obama was actually demonized, denigrated and mocked for his eloquence, as if it were a liability, a disability or a personal character flaw. This was the worst of the calumnies spread by Republican smear and fear advocates. Natural eloquence is the outward and visible sign of inner and superior thinking – of powerful reasoning transformed into coherent, moving verbiage, of character and conviction translated into elevated, discursive prose, investing lofty ideas with the luster they deserve.
Is it any accident that our worst presidents have been our most muddled, inarticulate, and even incoherent speakers? Has anyone ever read an inspiring volume filled with the great speeches of Warren G. Harding? Calvin Coolidge? Herbert Hoover? Richard Nixon? Or the second George Bush? If so, please guide me to the citations so I can begin reading!
Is it any accident that the greatest leaders in the Western democracies almost invariably have been great orators?
The malevolent and low-minded fear and detest eloquence because it is the sure sign of the warm-hearted and high-minded, and because the figure who is eloquent invariably has something to say.
Third, Obama took seriously the responsibility of judging on merit and ability the most important qualities in a running mate. Whether you like Joe Biden or despise him, his knowledge of international affairs and the politics of the differing regions of the world is unsurpassed in the American political arena. How could any group except cynical hypocrites champion McCain’s running mate, Gov. Youbetcha, as qualified by experience and intellect to step in and become president? Inarticulate, unlearned, unable to name a single newspaper she reads, unfamiliar with any world beyond moose killing and snowmobiling, and repeatedly unable to describe or define the job to which she wanted us to elect her, our best hope is now realized since she’s gone back to Alaska to bully librarians, intimidate teachers and ruin the public service careers of Alaskans who incur her ire. This is where she already has unquestioned experience.
Finally, I voted for Obama precisely because the McCain campaign was filled with smears that were the sheerest humbug and rankest tommyrot. There never was a “Straightalk Express,” only a “Huffing, Puffing No Mes-sage Local” that struggled out of the station jammed with a Washington gaggle of corrupt politicians (former Sen. Phil Gramm), charlatans (Karl Rove’s goons from Bush’s previous campaigns), tainted lobbyists and assorted Republican hucksters and hangers-on, crowding every available space like refugee trains filmed in old newsreels. These were people who would do and say anything to win an election, people from the last eight years who cynically ripped up the Constitution and shredded the Bill of Rights, and who then wanted the public to believe that things would be different under the “Maverick” John McCain!
This effrontery, in the most inelegant metaphor of the campaign, is truly the lipstick on the pig. To such a nadir has come the party of Abraham Lincoln, Theodore Roosevelt, Dwight Eisenhower and Ronald Reagan, with the ranks of its Old Guard riddled with corruption and sexual scandal, and only the vacuous Gov. Youbetcha to offer us for the future after spending 14 years wrecking our economy and nearly ruining our stature and standing in the world.
If I live long enough, I hope one day to tell my grandson that I recognized the emergence of redemptive greatness in an American leader. That I responded to his message, armed myself with a knowledge of the issues, and did what I knew to be more deeply right than anything I could recall in my adult life: that I voted for Barack Obama, and that in so doing, I kept faith with the miracle.
Charles W. Sydnor Jr. lives in Saltville, Va., and is the retired president of Emory & Henry College and the former chief executive officer of Commonwealth Public Broadcasting Corp. in Richmond.
Advertisement
Reader Reactions
Allen; I’m sorry that you can’t tell the difference between apinion and facts unless a person states that they are stating their opinion. Next; the only person that he refers directly to is Mr. Powell which leads me (in my opinion) to believe that he thinks people that didn’t vote for Obama could be or are racist. Next; I checked the voting records of both men before I voted did you? I can also honestly say that if Obama had run on the GOP ticket and McCain had run on the Democratic ticket I would still have voted for MCCain; can you make the statement that you would still have voted for Obama sir? Last if you approved of Mr. Sydnor’s column why not just say so instead of attacking people who don’t approve of the column? This is my last post on the subject.
Mr.Sydnor, Why are you such an angry person? Mr. Sydnor, you may be retired from Emory & Henry, however you still represent them. This was not a good choice to write such a letter. It started out good. You have the freedom to express your opinions. However, you are an intelligent person, so why would you have to continue to write about Republicans. My family is Republican and have also been a supporter of higher education in this area. It was always my fathers wish to donate to schools and one of his choices was Emory&Henry;. I continued to do this after his passing. This year when I return my Emory&Henry;letter , it will not have a check enclosed. It will however have a letter explaining why Emory&Henry;will not be receiving the end of year donation.If Emory&Henry;represent what you are, they do not represent me and my family.
Please try not to be such an angry man. It is not becoming to you.
Sincerely,
Jenny
Two feathers, I am looking at page A9 of the Sunday, November 30 paper. The article is 5 columns wide, has his picture, and 3” above and to the left of the picture it says COMMENTARY. On the Tricities.com website, if you access letters to the editor , you will not find the article entitled, Voting is society’s most important civil ritual. If you look under columnists, you will find it.
Allen, you asked if your thinking Two Feathers was wrong made you a liberal. That’s silly. It doesn’t make you anything. It only means you two disagree about something. That’s very healthy and good for all. Many liberals today can’t/won’t simply debate topics. They get incredibly nasty and start name-calling. Liberal or conservative, debate should exist without silly, and immature name-calling.
Mr Syndor’s letter IS a letter to the editor which plainly states 300 words or less. Dare we count the words?
Several things need to be addressed about this commentary.
1.Seawing, there is no problem with your having an opinion on what Mr. Sydnor thinks, but identify it as an opinion instead of stating it as a fact. Nowhere in that commentary did Mr. Sydnor mention or insinuate any thing concerning race. Me thinks you protest too much.
2. Farmer, you are right about Two Feathers voicing his thoughts. Would it make me a liberal if I point out that his thoughts are wrong? If I remember right, there is a 300 word limit on letters to the editor, but there is no such limit on commentary. If you would like to submit more than 300 words, I am sure the Opinion Page Editor would be glad to provide you with the guide lines for commentaries.
Two Feathers, I couldn’t agree more. I’d love to know why the BHC limits some to a mere 300 words, yet Mr. Sydnor was allowed to exceed that. That’s interesting.
Get ready sir. You’ve spoken out against liberals here. (Some would say you’ve simply exercised your 1st amendment right). The attacks against you will be coming soon, I bet. You didn’t threaten anyone nor did you try to scare anyone. You simply voiced your thoughts. It’s amazing that if the thoughts of anyone don’t match the liberal mindset, that person is labeled a racist, mean spirited, closed minded, etc. When did liberals stop being open to all views? It would seem to me that many liberals are exactly what they accuse conservatives of being. I at least hope they’ll come up with some new names for you. I’m kind of getting tired of the usual things they use.
Wonder why some people take a “liberal” approach and break rules just like the 300 word limit on this forum to write such propoganda? Typical liberal actions.
In my mind, “greatness” is applied to only those who earned such thru notable deeds. Mr Sydnor seems to have found greatness in a man who has done nothing but make big promises.
As far as Obama being the great orator, it seems that stuttering and stammering while thinking of what to say disqualifies him as a used car salesman, a door to door vaccumn cleaner saleman, a gypsy driveway paver or a water softener salesman who offers big rebates from a bankrupt trust.
What really concerns me at this time is that this “savior” was elected mainly by millions of totally uninformed voters who chose him based on race and an offer of something for nothing?? That is a really scary prospect??
Since I typify the illeterate,poor, stupid conservative veteran who wants only small unobtrusive government, I will crawl back into my hole for a couple of years till I can climb back out and say “I told you so”.
Till then Mr. Sydnor, please wipe your mouth, the froth and saliva is sickening.
I have always had the Greatest respect for Emory & Henry College. Have known many students that graduated from this school. After reading this article I would probably reconsider sending my child/grandchild to this college.I have much more class than you. I would never tell YOU that you are stupid for voting for Obama. What pleasure do get for saying such bad things about the McCain supporters?
Why do you even care?
I hope with all my heart that Barack Obama is all that he appears to be and all that he says he is. In order to be elected, every policitican has to tell us what we want to hear. The public is responsible for turning them into liars by necessity. In the last four elections I have voted for the candidate that promised health care. Do we yet have it? I did not vote for him because I was afraid he was a deceiver, but if he turns out to be the real thing, he most certainly will get my vote in the next election, because I want him to be the real thing, the country needs for him to be the real thing. I admire those who have looked into their crystal balls and decided they are absolutely right about everything, and make the rest of us sound stupid. In this matter, I hope they are correct.


Advertisement