J. TODD FOSTER: Bush Worked Hard To Earn Title Of Worst President
Two days from now, America will breathe a collective sigh of relief. The worst presidency in modern history – possibly U.S. history – mercifully will be over.
Who among us can honestly say they are better off today than eight years ago? Only the descendants of Millard Fillmore, Franklin Pierce, James Buchanan and Andrew Johnson – frequently recognized before now as the four worst presidents ever. Those families waited and prayed for generations for a guy like George W. Bush to come along.
And no, it’s not too early to render such a judgment despite Bush’s 2003 statement to journalist Bob Woodward: “History. We won’t know. We’ll all be dead.”
What an orator.
Many professional historians already have concluded that W stands for Worst. Of 109 interviewed in early 2008 by the History News Network, two historians rated his presidency a success; 107 rated it a failure. Sixty-one percent rated it the worst ever. Another 35 percent rated Bush’s presidency as among the worst.
And that was before the economy collapsed.
“At a time of national crisis, Pierce and Buchanan, who served in the eight years preceding the Civil War, and Johnson, who followed it, were simply not up to the job,” Columbia University history professor Eric Foner wrote two years ago. “Stubborn, narrow-minded, unwilling to listen to criticism or to consider alternatives to disastrous mistakes, they surrounded themselves with sycophants and shaped their policies to appeal to retrogressive political forces (in that era, pro-slavery and racist ideologues). Even after being repudiated in the midterm elections of 1854, 1858 and 1866, respectively, they ignored major currents of public opinion and clung to flawed policies. Bush’s presidency certainly brings theirs to mind.”
I used to think Bush was a decent fellow who was in over his head. He reminded me of a Saint Bernard left alone in a house. The dog’s master returns home and finds broken dishes, a chewed couch and other rampant destruction, but the dog is cheerfully wagging his tail and wanting to go for a walk.
Bush is oblivious like the Saint Bernard. But he possesses numerous dangerous qualities, which taken alone are bad enough.
Together, they forge a toxic cocktail.
Lazy. Stubborn. Arrogant. Apathetic. A lack of intellect and curiosity about how the world works and thinks. A man who sees the world in black and white, instead of nuanced in shades of gray. A man who believes God truly only blesses America and that the U.S. has a monopoly on good, while anyone who disagrees with us is evil.
“No individual president can compare to the second Bush,” one historian wrote in that History News Network survey. “Glib, contemptuous, ignorant, incurious, a dupe of anyone who humors his deluded belief in his heroic self, he has bankrupted the country with his disastrous war and his tax breaks for the rich, trampled on the Bill of Rights, appointed foxes in every henhouse, compounded the terrorist threat, turned a blind eye to torture and corruption and a looming ecological disaster, and squandered the rest of the world’s goodwill. In short, no other president’s faults have had so deleterious an effect on not only the country but the world at large.”
America’s standards for its presidents are not impossibly high. We want someone who is among the smartest in the room, who works hard, who reads his briefing papers, who listens to reason and, when he fails, is willing to admit it and change course.
W can’t bring himself to admit a single mistake – only “disappointments,” including the inexplicable “disappointment” of not finding weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.
Disappointment is when Baskin-Robbins is out of your favorite flavor. When it rains out your softball game. When you lose at B-I-N-G-O.
Disaster is when you wrongly invade a country, kill tens of thousands of civilians and send several thousand of your own soldiers and Marines to their deaths. Incompetence and cronyism, not disappointment, result when you preside over the worst economic collapse since the Great Depression. Only political stupidity and lack of empathy would allow an American city to drown while you vacation and play the guitar in California – a modern-day Nero fiddling while Rome burned.
Speaking of vacations, Bush had nearly twice as many of them as press conferences. He chopped more wood, rode more bikes and played more video games than any president in history.
Even the people he surrounded himself with – notably Vice President Dick Cheney, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld and Attorney General Alberto Gonzales – will go down as among the worst in history.
“With his unprovoked and disastrous war of aggression in Iraq and his monstrous deficits, Bush has set this country on a course that will take decades to correct,” said another historian. “When future historians look back to identify the moment at which the United States began to lose its position of world leadership, they will point – rightly – to the Bush presidency. Thanks to his policies, it is now easy to see America losing out to its competitors in any number of areas: China is rapidly becoming the manufacturing powerhouse of the next century, India the high tech and services leader, and Europe the region with the best quality of life.”
None of us knows what kind of president Barack Obama will be. But we do know this: Obama is whip smart, pragmatic and eloquent. He reads real books and writes them, too. He can string together words in a manner that inspires Americans, not makes us international laughingstocks. And – the ridiculous label of socialist aside – Obama already has shown himself to be a common-sense centrist.
In 2000, this nation had the opportunity – and actually did by popular vote – to elect the smartest candidate.
The Electoral College, aided by the Supreme Court, threw the presidency to the guy most of us preferred to share a beer with.
We know what a smart president can do. Bill Clinton was an intellectual giant – above the waist anyway – and tireless. He balanced budgets and generated surpluses.
W has put your grandchildren in hock. That’s what happens when you elect a president who’s the smartest person in the room only when he’s alone.
By now, some of you are accusing me of being overly harsh. You probably don’t have relatives who are so afraid of traveling overseas as Americans that they put Canadian maple leaf stickers on their luggage.
And then there’s my latest 401(k) statement. I’ll have to work until I’m 90 to afford retirement. And you think I’m ornery now.
J. Todd Foster is managing editor of the Bristol Herald Courier and can be reached at or (276) 645-2513.
Advertisement
Reader Reactions
To my right and left wing friends
Either help out or move over for the new generation of both young and older independent progressives, environmental activists, voting rights activists, and “no BS” politicians like Henry Waxman.
I hope we all help rebuild what is left of America’s national honor, economy and environment, courtesy of the Administration’s incompetence and greed over past 8 years.
To borrow a statement from the Viet Nam war protests of the 1960’s: “If you’re not part of the solution, you’re part of the problem.“
Terry,
Many of the folks who visit here take things way too seriously. I very much enjoy pushing their buttons a little bit. I’m not sure they realize just where they’re posting. This isn’t exactly “Meet the Press” or anything like that. It’s the BHC, for heaven’s sake!! None of us are high level political people. If we were, I doubt we’d be writing stuff here. I think it’s funny that some here do what seems like a huge amount of research. I’ve never checked their sources. I don’t care enough to. The time they must spend trying to one-up someone else is too funny. You used the word, vicious, in describing some of them. A good choice. I’ve actually asked here a few times why liberals tend to be so angry about most everything. I’ve never really gotten an answer.
There are actually 3 or 4 of us who come here as “Farmer.“ A reader who reads really closely would be able to see slightly different views, and word usage from “Farmer.“ I can assure you, and the ones who get so mad, we come here for laughs. Some of the others here are too easily irritated. I’ve said things that I absolutely don’t believe just to get them going. It usually works, and is so funny.
Recently, I wrote several things concerning another article that I was dead serious about. In other words, I wasn’t here trying to irritate the usual liberal characters. It was concerning the current state of U.S. public schools. Someone named Sparkie and I had a terrific, and serious discussion about the subject.
Oh well, I hope the fun continues. I love watching as they get so bent out of shape. They make it too easy.
Take Care
allen, that was a good post, this has turned out to be interesting in many different ways. What you said about suggestions you inserted that might turn our ecomomy around will draw some raw replies. The majority of the people in this area don’t believe in orginized labor. They support, or have in the past, government deregulation of bussinesses and industry. They believe the Federal Government needs to keep it’s nose out of their bussiness but they will not hesitate to call on the Federal Government to rush to their rescue when they screw up and their way of life is threatened.
Her’s a suggestion which will also draw some critical comments. Instead of the Government giving Billions of dollars to Banks, Lenders and the American Automotive Industry why not but that money back in the hands of the taxpayers. Wait, wait, here me out. If the same amount ($800 Billion plus) were devided equally (that statement alone will draw fire) between the taxpayers with a law that states the money given must FIRST be used to pay off ANY and ALL debts owed by the taxpayer before one penny can be used for new purchases, if a balance remains. What would that do to improve the ecomony? or would it.
How to regulate, control and oversee that process is another issue. But if we want to begin to start a recovery of the ecomomy we must first but money in the hands of the taxpaying public where they can once again afford to purchase things beyond the necessities to survive.
Farmer guy. You are hoot!!! I love your intelligent and witty responses to a few of the hard line Bush bashing libs on here that have dominated these blogs for so long. I used to give a few of my comments and opinions here, but some of these same bitter people became so vicious with their replies that I finally figured out that I had more constructive things to do with my time. And I think that several others felt the same since I seldom see them any longer. However, I do enjoy your jousting with them. Keep up the good fight, Bro!! And I’ll keep tuning in…
WOW! The reaction to this editorial has been fantastic. Unfortunately it points out one of the biggest problems that all of our Presidents have faced. Virtually all of of these posts have pointed out at least one person or group that we can blame for all our problems, even going back as far as the Civil War. News Flash: We do not need any more suggestions on who to blame. We have a couple hundred million people out there who can do that.
What we need now are suggestions on how to solve our problems. The best way to solve our problems will probably be a combination of many different suggestions. Since economics is survival, I’ll start the ball rolling with a suggestion on how to improve our economy.
We built the strongest economy in the world under a simple program of strong organized labor, aggressive protectionism, and government regulation of essential industries. We know without a doubt, that system worked. I say go back to it. Let’s hear some other suggestions.
OK, Bossman (Chester),
Slugger here.
So are you saying that the ideas that all things will be fantastic simply because Obama was elected, started on the right? That’s interesting.
I never once implied that Obama said any of that stuff. I’m not talking about him now. In an earlier message I said that I respected him, and supported him 100%. He’s my president, and his successes equal my successes. He’s a bright guy. He knows he can’t be all things to all people.
I’m talking about the loons out and about who think Mr. Obama is the answer to all their woes. He isn’t!! He, nor any politician, can fix problems citizens may have. We, as citizens, must step up and do for ourselves. (That must hurt liberals deeply to hear something as awful as promoting personal responsibility). Sorry!!)
If you think more government is the answer, you may be one of the loons. What’s one thing the government handles well?
As for my stories of people thinking their bills are about to disappear….I assume you think I’m making that up. Good guess, but I would’ve never thought anyone could be so twisted. I’ve heard it around here, at a Verizon office. My friends heard it in Georgia a post office. Now, am I suggesting that ALL Obama supporters think like this? Certainly not. However, I thought it interesting that people here, as well as Georgia, were spouting same the message. OK, I suppose it could’ve been the EXACT same people who travelled from here to Macon, but that seems unlikely. Different places, different people with the same misguided thoughts? Perhaps a coincidence.
No, I didn’t get their names, Social Security #s, blood type, or recent illnesses. I was just living my life and observed this, then thought it was funny that my friends said the same thing from southern Georgia. I don’t have a notary public’s stamp on anything to make it official. It’s just what I’ve heard. Do you suppose that these thoughts are the thoughts of ONLY two people? Could be, but I doubt it.
Relax a bit Bossman. You take this stuff way too seriously. Sit down and have a relaxing meal. Maybe watch some TV. I’ll check back later.
Slugger
Someone alerted me yesterday to all the reader reactions to my latest column. The personal attacks aside, I love the back and forth that my “screed” has generated. It reinforces my belief that ultimately this nation and her citizens will find our way out of any jam.
Let me correct the record, at least partially, though:
1) I’m not a Yankee; I’m more Southern than 95 percent of the readers on this forum.
2) I’m a Christian
3) I’m not a liberal Democrat (don’t care for them too much either)
4) I don’t hate Bush; I just think he was a lousy president
5) I did not attack anyone who voted for Bush, or anyone in this area.
Finally, anyone who cancels a newspaper subscription over an editor’s column might want to seek professional help. Such a reaction could only come from a person who, 233 years ago, would have been resisting American revolutionaries and siding with King George.
Debate on, Christian soldiers.
Todd
Chester, you need to calm yourself. Farmer, if you’re reading this say some soothing words to your friend Chester.
Firstly, we didn’t have a civil war in this country. We had a “War for Southern Independence.“ I have explained that to you before. A civil war is when two or more factions are battling for control of and existing government.
The federal government was created by the states, not the other way around. The south had every right to secede.
You can call it revisionist history, or what ever you want Chester I don’t care. However, you are not, I REPEAT, NOT going to get me to heap praises on a president that started a war that caused 600,000 deaths and untold hardship on the southern people.
So you just blather on about me being in favor of slavery,(HOW ABSURD!) all you want, but it isn’t going to change my opinion. By the way, I didn’t say Lincoln was pro-slavery, I said he was a white supremacist, and whether I cherry picked it or not doesn’t change the fact that he said it. Of course, Lincoln was a politician so may be he miss spoke.
To farmer
Chester is too polite to say so, but it should be “MISTER BOSSMAN” to you.
To the rest of the right wingnuts.
When I read your paranoid ravings and your racist/classist hatred of all on welfare or public assistance several quotations come to mind, but one stands out:
“Ignorance is bliss.“
Besides being “blissed” you must be blind to the billions of tax dollars that the Bush administration has given out as “corporate welfare” to the whining Republican fat cats (your bosses) on Wall Street and as no-bid contracts to Halliburton.
Are you blind to the Bush Administration’s provision that the Medicare Prescription Plan must pay the pharmaceutical industry retail top dollar rather than ask for competitive bids?
What about their prohibition of re-importation of these same “Made in USA” drugs from Canada, where they were sold at much lower prices?
Chester,
Do you prefer I call you Hoss, or Bossman? I figure if I can be “Slugger”, you can be something too. I like Hoss, but will make it whatever you want. Maybe Bubba?
Let me know.


Advertisement