J. TODD FOSTER: Bush Worked Hard To Earn Title Of Worst President
Two days from now, America will breathe a collective sigh of relief. The worst presidency in modern history – possibly U.S. history – mercifully will be over.
Who among us can honestly say they are better off today than eight years ago? Only the descendants of Millard Fillmore, Franklin Pierce, James Buchanan and Andrew Johnson – frequently recognized before now as the four worst presidents ever. Those families waited and prayed for generations for a guy like George W. Bush to come along.
And no, it’s not too early to render such a judgment despite Bush’s 2003 statement to journalist Bob Woodward: “History. We won’t know. We’ll all be dead.”
What an orator.
Many professional historians already have concluded that W stands for Worst. Of 109 interviewed in early 2008 by the History News Network, two historians rated his presidency a success; 107 rated it a failure. Sixty-one percent rated it the worst ever. Another 35 percent rated Bush’s presidency as among the worst.
And that was before the economy collapsed.
“At a time of national crisis, Pierce and Buchanan, who served in the eight years preceding the Civil War, and Johnson, who followed it, were simply not up to the job,” Columbia University history professor Eric Foner wrote two years ago. “Stubborn, narrow-minded, unwilling to listen to criticism or to consider alternatives to disastrous mistakes, they surrounded themselves with sycophants and shaped their policies to appeal to retrogressive political forces (in that era, pro-slavery and racist ideologues). Even after being repudiated in the midterm elections of 1854, 1858 and 1866, respectively, they ignored major currents of public opinion and clung to flawed policies. Bush’s presidency certainly brings theirs to mind.”
I used to think Bush was a decent fellow who was in over his head. He reminded me of a Saint Bernard left alone in a house. The dog’s master returns home and finds broken dishes, a chewed couch and other rampant destruction, but the dog is cheerfully wagging his tail and wanting to go for a walk.
Bush is oblivious like the Saint Bernard. But he possesses numerous dangerous qualities, which taken alone are bad enough.
Together, they forge a toxic cocktail.
Lazy. Stubborn. Arrogant. Apathetic. A lack of intellect and curiosity about how the world works and thinks. A man who sees the world in black and white, instead of nuanced in shades of gray. A man who believes God truly only blesses America and that the U.S. has a monopoly on good, while anyone who disagrees with us is evil.
“No individual president can compare to the second Bush,” one historian wrote in that History News Network survey. “Glib, contemptuous, ignorant, incurious, a dupe of anyone who humors his deluded belief in his heroic self, he has bankrupted the country with his disastrous war and his tax breaks for the rich, trampled on the Bill of Rights, appointed foxes in every henhouse, compounded the terrorist threat, turned a blind eye to torture and corruption and a looming ecological disaster, and squandered the rest of the world’s goodwill. In short, no other president’s faults have had so deleterious an effect on not only the country but the world at large.”
America’s standards for its presidents are not impossibly high. We want someone who is among the smartest in the room, who works hard, who reads his briefing papers, who listens to reason and, when he fails, is willing to admit it and change course.
W can’t bring himself to admit a single mistake – only “disappointments,” including the inexplicable “disappointment” of not finding weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.
Disappointment is when Baskin-Robbins is out of your favorite flavor. When it rains out your softball game. When you lose at B-I-N-G-O.
Disaster is when you wrongly invade a country, kill tens of thousands of civilians and send several thousand of your own soldiers and Marines to their deaths. Incompetence and cronyism, not disappointment, result when you preside over the worst economic collapse since the Great Depression. Only political stupidity and lack of empathy would allow an American city to drown while you vacation and play the guitar in California – a modern-day Nero fiddling while Rome burned.
Speaking of vacations, Bush had nearly twice as many of them as press conferences. He chopped more wood, rode more bikes and played more video games than any president in history.
Even the people he surrounded himself with – notably Vice President Dick Cheney, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld and Attorney General Alberto Gonzales – will go down as among the worst in history.
“With his unprovoked and disastrous war of aggression in Iraq and his monstrous deficits, Bush has set this country on a course that will take decades to correct,” said another historian. “When future historians look back to identify the moment at which the United States began to lose its position of world leadership, they will point – rightly – to the Bush presidency. Thanks to his policies, it is now easy to see America losing out to its competitors in any number of areas: China is rapidly becoming the manufacturing powerhouse of the next century, India the high tech and services leader, and Europe the region with the best quality of life.”
None of us knows what kind of president Barack Obama will be. But we do know this: Obama is whip smart, pragmatic and eloquent. He reads real books and writes them, too. He can string together words in a manner that inspires Americans, not makes us international laughingstocks. And – the ridiculous label of socialist aside – Obama already has shown himself to be a common-sense centrist.
In 2000, this nation had the opportunity – and actually did by popular vote – to elect the smartest candidate.
The Electoral College, aided by the Supreme Court, threw the presidency to the guy most of us preferred to share a beer with.
We know what a smart president can do. Bill Clinton was an intellectual giant – above the waist anyway – and tireless. He balanced budgets and generated surpluses.
W has put your grandchildren in hock. That’s what happens when you elect a president who’s the smartest person in the room only when he’s alone.
By now, some of you are accusing me of being overly harsh. You probably don’t have relatives who are so afraid of traveling overseas as Americans that they put Canadian maple leaf stickers on their luggage.
And then there’s my latest 401(k) statement. I’ll have to work until I’m 90 to afford retirement. And you think I’m ornery now.
J. Todd Foster is managing editor of the Bristol Herald Courier and can be reached at or (276) 645-2513.
Advertisement
Reader Reactions
Given the interest others on this site have shown in Lincoln and Douglass, I just noted a book review of new publications about them on Truthdig.com
Check it out at:
http://tinyurl.com/aqrwj6
farmer, you and Terry have the handle on this blog thing. Many Bloggers take issues posted here way too seriously and personal. Some lay and wait in the shadows to pounce on anyone that makes a commit that differs from their own views and beliefs. I thought that letters to the Editor were listed in the BHC under the OPINION section. As you both have seen most people here thinks that their ideas and beliefs on issues are gospel and they are offended if anyone challenges those beliefs by posting a different opinion.
My Dad told me many years ago “when a person begins to stops listening to and evaluating different ideas and opinions they begin the process of becoming brain dead in thought and reasoning”. One can find a lot of those here.
See you on the flip side.
D.
bbart,
Let the record show that you did indeed have the last word yesterday. Yet another victory, I suppose. I’m preparing tonight for an 11:59 post so I can have the honor at least once.
Again with the “clowns” stuff? Come on, you’re better than that, aren’t you? I bet that some funny names could be applied to you here, too. However, I’ll leave the name calling to my little girl. She’s 6, and for a 6 year old, that kind of stuff is probably appropriate.
Please relax. As I told my good friend Chester (Bossman), watch some TV or something. You take this stuff far too seriously. And you’re far too easily irritated. As I tell my 6 year old, if you let them know they’re bothering you, it’ll only get worse.
I never know if I’m reading farmer1, farmer2, farmer3, or farmer4. Since I can’t tell you apart, the term “clowns” seems to cover all four.
I’m curious, do you vote on your opinions and how many times you write in the dreaded “L” word?
Me? I’m just one person, and I’m not even a “liberal.“ I did grow up in the Appalachians as a once proud Conservative Republican. I have been a truck driver, and, at one time, I was even a member of the UMWA. I am now registered as an Independent.
Following JFK’s death and after LBJ signed civil and voting rights legislation there was a massive influx of Dixiecrats and closet racists into the Republican Party. These folks have been in charge of the southern portion of the party ever since. They do not wear their white robes and hoods in public, but the feeling is there.
Remember Frist diagnosing the brain dead woman in Florida via television, saying she was okay ??? Tennesseans sure do have some strange views on health care. The day of the Politician and the Profit Machine coming ahead of the people is over, we are digging our own grave in Appalachia and no one cares unless they can gouge, plunder and pillage for every damned dime and dollar to fill their filthy pockets at our expense. Change is coming from the bottom up in Appalachia - Get ready ! www.wisecountyissues.com Just because “they” say it’s so, don’t mean it’s so…
See what I mean? They (liberals who frequent this site) can’t help but always try to get in that last little shot. And, as usual, just a touch of name calling. Some of us are apparently “clowns.“ The other day it was “Slugger.“ I like this whole name thing, but I’ll just stick to whatever everyone signs in as.
My feelings are so hurt now. I’ll probably toss and turn all night. Please bbart, don’t be so mean.
Hey there. You just listed my four favorites. I do still have to chuckle when I remember his Republican handlers rolling a brain dead Strom Thurmond into Congress. You clowns can come up with some good ones. Keep reminding yourselves of your “good old days.“
I DON’T care whether it’s Waxman or Frank. But my saying that sure could get bbart fired up. I could just as easily have said Pelosi or Reid.
It takes very little to get these liberals irritated. Just watch.
framer, you just got through telling Terry that you are all BS so why would you care whether he said Waxman or Frank?
Henry Waxman? Isn’t he just a Barney Frank clone? Interesting choice for you to mention.


Advertisement