Washington Board Rejects Love’s

Washington Board Rejects Love’s

By Debra McCown/Bristol Herald Courier

A large crowd attends the meeting of the Washington County Board of Supervisors in Abingdon on Tuesday.

» 154 Comments | Post a Comment

ABINGDON, Va. – The crowd broke into applause Tuesday when the Washington County Board of Supervisors voted 4-3 to turn down a Love’s truck stop proposed for Exit 24.

Board Chairman Kenneth Reynolds turned the gavel over to Vice-Chairman Jack McCrady so he could make the motion that killed the controversial project; in June he voted against the same motion.
“At that point [in June] I was still learning and still listening, and I did right up to tonight, really,” Reynolds said. “I got a lot of calls today.”

Reynolds, McCrady, Dulcie Mumpower and Tom Taylor voted to deny the re-zoning and special exception permit needed for the truck stop; Odell Owens, Phil McCall and Paul Price voted to grant them.

The controversial project, on which Love’s has spent several years and a considerable sum, would have placed a truck stop at Exit 24, about 1,000 feet from Meadowview Elementary School.

The project has divided the community, pitting neighbor against neighbor over the need for jobs, concerns about traffic and air quality, and competing development priorities.

Reynolds, whose vote ultimately blocked the project, said he didn’t really change his mind and there was no one specific thing that led to his decision; it was based on his overall evaluation of the information.

“I made this motion because we just have so many unknowns that we haven’t been able to address,” Reynolds said during the meeting. “We have unknowns expressed by so many people.”

Rick Shuffield, spokesman for Love’s Travel Centers, said the vote came as a surprise.

Asked whether he’d consider a different Washington County location, and whether he would sue the county over Tuesday’s decision, he said: “We’re just going to explore our options at this point in time.”

Meadowview residents who favored the project had no comment; opponents called it a victory for the children of Meadowview.

“I hope the Board of Supervisors can sleep well tonight because they did the right thing,” said Celeste Gaia, one of the most outspoken project opponents.

“I’d prefer the truck stop go in simply because there are too many people in this county that need jobs,” said Joe Straten, who favored the project and is running for McCrady’s seat on the board.

As board members spoke their piece during the meeting about the meaning of their votes, their discussion was peppered with personal comments.

“They have done everything we’ve asked them to do, and … I don’t think we have a right to deny this permit,” Price said of Love’s. “What kind of message are we fixing to send to people who want to bring business to this county when we’ve got a business that never came with their hand out asking for a penny to create jobs?”

Mumpower said there is no way to know if exhaust from the trucks would float toward the nearby school, but the issued had to be considered.

“The question is, are we willing to sacrifice the health of a child not knowing one way or the other,” she said.

Taylor said the truck stop is “the right use and the wrong location.”

Reynolds and McCrady said the board would likely look more favorably at the project locating at nearby Exit 22, an alternative suggested by opponents many times during the process.

“I wouldn’t be opposed to it,” Reynolds said. “I hope they’ll look at other options [besides Exit 24].” McCrady said he believes the board would “absolutely” be favorable to locating the project at Exit 22.

Now that the decision has been made on Exit 24, Price said, he’s hopeful that Meadowview can heal its divide and move forward.

“I hope after the vote tonight that neighbors can go back to being neighbors,” he said.

| (276) 791-0701

Advertisement

 
View More: No tags are associated with this article
Not what you're looking for? Try our quick search:
 

Advertisement

Reader Reactions

Flag Comment Posted by peterbilt4me on July 17, 2009 at 9:35 pm

want2no….someone should kick him where the sun dont shine…you no??

Flag Comment Posted by want2no on July 17, 2009 at 9:27 pm

Peterbilt, he is going to have a hard time answering that one since NO ONE said there was a bribery. He takes other peoples words and twist them around to make something out of nothing. Watch what he says real close.Check him out on other sites, everyone wants to kick him out of the conversations.

Flag Comment Posted by peterbilt4me on July 17, 2009 at 8:56 pm

Its just me and you now because betty must be asleep….sorry…So what is your problem??? Who said something about bribery??

Flag Comment Posted by peterbilt4me on July 17, 2009 at 8:52 pm

common….Leave twotooths alone…You are after me anyway…not him…

Flag Comment Posted by commonsense on July 17, 2009 at 8:14 pm

twotooths
Frankly, I never did take a position on the issue because I don’t care.

What brought me into the issue was all the talk of Board members being accused of bribery.

Once that charge was leveled- I jumped in top see if there was any evidence, or just sour grapes.

So, don’t get your panties in a wad because I really don’t care if you have a truck stop, or not.

It sure was a mess though, on both sides.

PS I do hate to see Wash. County not get every job available.

Flag Comment Posted by peterbilt4me on July 17, 2009 at 5:26 pm

stardodger…exit 22 is not available.

Flag Comment Posted by want2no on July 17, 2009 at 5:25 pm

Twotooths,We vote for you to take TTaylor’s position! You summed the whole situation up in a few words. Some of the folks can’t understand that the property at exit 22 IS NOT FOR SALE.

Flag Comment Posted by StarDodger on July 17, 2009 at 5:13 pm

“With proper traffic control…“

That was exactly the problem.  I agree with Mr. Taylor - right use, wrong location.  Exit 24 is not designed for large trucks.  It surely isn’t designed for a large quantity of large trucks.  I never have understood why Love’s picked such a lousy interchange for this project.  Exit 22 is designed for large trucks.  Also, because of KVAT/MidMountain it is one of the first to be cleared in bad weather.  Mr. Smith makes sure those Food City trucks run.  Love’s would do well to move in near his facility.

Exit 29 already has an improved interchange and a truck stop.  Plenty of room to move there (and ruffle up the competition), too.  The elementary school not withstanding, Exit 22 was just a poor choice for a truck stop.  It makes me wonder what Love’s was thinking. 

And I’m still not sure what are all these fantastic “benefits” you all are talking about.  Part time cashier and waitressing jobs don’t come with health insurance and 401Ks.

Flag Comment Posted by peterbilt4me on July 17, 2009 at 4:48 pm

twotooths….you said it all….

Flag Comment Posted by twotooths on July 17, 2009 at 3:39 pm

Commonsense, why don’t you shut up and keep your nose out of this, you have already said you don’t live in Meadowview, so what goes on there is none of your business. Meadowview doesn’t have any ball fields. These people who are commenting in favor needed the truck stop very bad, the supervisors who voted against it did not vote the will of the people in Meadowview, but the will of people from Emory, Glade, Abingdon. They used the children for an excuse. It has been pointed out here that there are other schools that are just as close to being exposed to diesel fumes as Meadowview would have been to the proposed truck stop. With proper traffic control the traffic would not have been a problem. You people just don’t understand, Meadowview needed the truck stop for the benefits it would have given the people who live in Meadowview. Who gives a crap about the “over priced” little restaurant in the Town Square. The people who were against it were just better organized and had better resources available to them. They made the loudest noise, the squeaking wheel always gets the grease. If the supervisors had done the right thing, they would have approved the truck stop and accepted all the benefits that were coming with it. It just boils down to the have’s and the have not’s, the have’s are set to go, they have all they need and don’t want to be bothered so the have not’s can get a chance to improve their lives.

Post a Comment(Requires free registration)

The commenting period has ended or commenting has been deactivated for this article.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement