School Board Passes Resolution Opposing Truck Stop at Exit 24

School Board Passes Resolution Opposing Truck Stop at Exit 24

Associated Press Graphic

» 10 Comments | Post a Comment

The Washington County, Va., School Board and a county supervisor now oppose a controversial truck stop proposed for the Exit 24 area of Interstate 81.

In a unanimous vote Monday, the School Board decided to have Superintendent Alan Lee write a letter outlining the board’s concerns to the county Planning Commission and to attend that body’s May 18 meeting.

Planned by Love’s Travel Stops & Country Stores, the truck stop would be built on state Route 80 about 1,000 feet from Meadowview Elementary School.

“There are heightened risks to children, staff and parents connected to a truck stop being so close to our largest elementary school,” said School Board member Buckey Boone, who made the motion.

He also said the truck stop would mean increased traffic in the area, a likelihood of more accidents and an increase of diesel fuel exhaust, which has been tied to asthma in children.

County Supervisor Tom Taylor, who represents the Monroe District, which includes Meadowview, Emory and Glade Spring, said he attended the School Board meeting and felt its members made a responsible decision.

“I would love to have the jobs and love to have the convenience of a gas station and food establishment at that exit, but we don’t need the trucks. That’s not the place,” Taylor said Tuesday, adding that there are safety concerns because the interchange is too narrow for truck traffic.

What the county does not need, Taylor said, is another problem interchange like Exit 17 in Abingdon, which he referred to as “malfunction junction.” That exit has been on the “five-year [improvement] plan for 20 years,” he said.

Several community meetings have been held to discuss the truck stop, with crowds expressing support and opposition. Proponents say it would bring much-needed development and jobs to the community.

Lee, the school superintendent, said the truck stop could mean some positive things for the community, but there are too many concerns about its proximity to the school, which has about 640 students. He said his main worry is that the truck stop would change the “rural climate” of the school.

“People going up or down the interstate really have no reason to get off at that exit, there is no gas station, no fast-food place, nothing to draw them off that exit, so it’s really a local traffic exit,” Lee said. “But by putting a truck stop there, which means fuel, snacks, and my understanding a Subway or Wendy’s, we are anticipating a large number of travelers coming off the interstate. Suddenly, it would go from an elementary school to a commercial setting.”

Another major concern is the added congestion that would occur when kids are being dropped off and picked up from school every day, he said.

Some board members also fear the possibility of an accident involving a big truck, but Lee stressed they are not worried about the truckers’ driving or behavior. He said school officials are more concerned about the others who would be drawn to the exit.

There also is some concern that there could be a leak or a chemical spill by one of the trucks using the truck stop, Lee said.

Calls for comment to Rick Shuffield, the director of real estate and development for Love’s who held two recent informational meetings here, were not returned Tuesday.

Last week, Washington County Planning Commission Chairman Steve Fisher urged those on both sides of the issue to make their voices heard by those who will decide whether it will be built. The commission will make a recommendation on whether the property should be rezoned and a special exception permit granted, both of which are needed for the project to go forward.

Final approval must come from the county’s Board of Supervisors, and state and federal transportation agencies.

| (276) 645-2533

Advertisement

 
View More: No tags are associated with this article
Not what you're looking for? Try our quick search:
 

Advertisement

Reader Reactions

Flag Comment Posted by BrightBetty on May 13, 2009 at 4:03 pm

Oh really Bill? A Lowes? Please do be putting a link to that information, I’d love to see it. 

And good for you and your experiences at exit 19. In the 10 years that I have been using that exit I can assure you I am not the only driver to have that experience, and there have been plenty of fender benders at that particular exit.

No one has said we don’t want the jobs, it’s the fact of the location-WHY pick the area right next to an elementary school? It’s doesn’t seem practical or beneficial. I’m with Next, I think there shou andld at least be survey’s done to find evidence of whether or not this would negatively impact the school that already exists at that exit. There is enough of a public concern to warrant that, at least.

Flag Comment Posted by Radio Bill on May 13, 2009 at 1:19 pm

EaTn, if you knew that the school location was a poor one to begin with and should not even been built there you might not be jumping on this so quickly. And further that school will have close and be rebuilt in the future. Bright Betty, I use exit 19 and the truckers have been more than courteous. The only traffic tie up that I have seen was when one truck turning into the stop tipped over. And that gave some excitement to the area. And get your facts straight the truck stop at 19 will be replaced by Lowe’s.
And for the school board, passing a resolution, you be better off thinking about the jobs to local people that will be able to pay their property taxes so that you can have job too!

Flag Comment Posted by BrightBetty on May 13, 2009 at 11:29 am

Now, now, Farmer, stop being silly and remember to read.

And while I know my Dr. Pepper addiction isn’t healthy for me, I’m pretty sure it’s not clouding my judgment. What do you drink in the morning? I want to make sure I never touch it, as I would hate to turn into a illiterate.

Flag Comment Posted by farmer on May 13, 2009 at 10:32 am

So BrightBetty,

Where are the truckers murdering people now, and what will make them change their murdering location to Meadowview?

You can’t mean all the junk you post here. Stop drinking so early in the day. You should know better.

Flag Comment Posted by Next ? on May 13, 2009 at 10:01 am

There has been a lot of commits made without any solid grounds to support the concern on this issue. There hasn’t been any investigation to justify the alligations made against the proposed truck stop and it’s affects on the community and the school. Granted the safety of the children at Meadowview Elementary must be formost in whatever decission is made. But there are several issues and concerns involved here, most are just personal feelings without substance.
Why hasn’t anyone looked at the “big picture” at exit 29 at Glade. Has anyone talked to the residents and businesses and town council members at Glade to get some first-hand knowledge from a community that has “been there, done that” to see how they feel now and if they had it to do over again would they have allowed a truck stop at Exit 29.
  There needs to be a little more effort but into finding evidence to support the positive effects to the community as well as the negative aspects that any business will have that will generate more traffic to that exit. Personal feelings are important but should not cloud the process of logical thinking.

Flag Comment Posted by BrightBetty on May 13, 2009 at 9:14 am

Oh Farmer, I was waiting for you to show up, and here you are to brighten my day :D

Before you get your panties in too much of a twist, definition number 3 of murderous is as follows: extremely difficult, dangerous, or unpleasant.

So admit it, you missed me, didn’t you? ;D

Flag Comment Posted by farmer on May 13, 2009 at 8:23 am

Murderous???  Are you kidding?  Truckers would be murdering people?

You need to go back to bed for some rest. Murder?  Oh, your credibility is very clear now. It’s ZERO!!!!

Do you know what murder means?

Flag Comment Posted by BrightBetty on May 13, 2009 at 8:03 am

I had to laugh when I read the part about them “not being concerned about the truckers driving”. I take exit 19 regularly, where there is a truck stop. I cannot tell you how many times I’ve had a trucker pull out in front of me as they try to get across the 4 lane, causing me to slam on my brakes. Sometimes they just pull across and block the highway at their convenience bringing traffic to a stand still until a break in traffic opens on the other side. I can’t imagine how murderous this would be so close to a school.

Like the school board said, I’m not opposed to the jobs, just the location. There are other exits where this truck stop could be built, especially as there *is* one already at 19-do you really need two truck stops within 5 miles of one another? No would be the logical answer.

Flag Comment Posted by EaTn on May 13, 2009 at 8:00 am

I don’t have any kids that go to this school, but if I did I would be at every meeting held to protest a truck stop within a third mile of the school.

Flag Comment Posted by Radio Bill on May 13, 2009 at 4:35 am

Exit 24 will develope one day, And one day that school will be shut down and another one built elsewhere. That is just progress. The people expressing their views against this truck stop, I believe are just against change and are using any excuse for it not to be there. The time expressed by Lee for people dropping off/pickup is minimal. And the school btw is not open all year around. So Tom Taylor needs for once to become pro-business as people in his district needs jobs and health insurance. Young people need jobs too.
The people in Washington County need to contact their supervisor and support this truck stop. And for once stop letting a few people rule this county!

Post a Comment(Requires free registration)

The commenting period has ended or commenting has been deactivated for this article.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement