Man Arrested For Unlawful Photography

Man Arrested For Unlawful Photography
» 58 Comments | Post a Comment

Nearly everyone carries a cell phone and it’s hard to find one without that camera feature.  It’s convenient when you want to take that impromptu photo, but a Tri-Cities area man ended up behind bars after snapping a shot of a Johnson County sheriff’s deputy during a traffic stop.

The cell phone photographer says the arrest was intimidation, but the deputy says he feared for his life.

“Here’s a guy who takes me out of the car and arrests me in front of my kids.  For what?  To take a picture of a police officer?“ said Scott Conover.

A Johnson County sheriff’s deputy arrested Scott Conover for unlawful photography.

“He says you took a picture of me.  It’s illegal to take a picture of a law enforcement officer,“ said Conover.

Conover took a picture of a sheriff’s deputy on the side of the road on a traffic stop.  Conover was stunned by the charge.

“This is a public highway,“ said Conover.

And it was not a place where there is a reasonable expectation of privacy as Tennessee code states.  The deputy also asked Conover to delete the picture three times.

“He said if you don’t give it to me, you’re going to jail,“ said Conover.

Under the advice of the Johnson County attorney, the sheriff would not comment and the arresting deputy said he didn’t want to incriminate himself by talking to us.

In an affidavit, the deputy said he saw something black with a red light which he thought was a threat.  Conover was also arrested for pointing a laser at a law enforcement officer.

“At no time did I have a laser.  I had an iPhone,“ said Conover.

When you take a picture in the dark with Conover’s Apple iPhone, there is no flash or any light that comes from the phone that could be mistaken for a laser.

In a witness statement by a Mountain City officer, is says the deputy asked about the picture rather than looking for a laser.

“If you arrested me, wouldn’t you take the laser?  If you arrested me, wouldn’t you take the camera?“ said Conover.

He expects these charges to be dismissed.

“This guy maliciously arrested me, charging me with phony charges that he don’t even understand himself,“ Conover said.

The American Civil Liberties Union would not comment on Conover’s case without fully reviewing the allegations, but told us there is no law that prohibits anyone from taking photographs in public areas, even of police.  Taking photos is protected by the First Amendment.  Conover is ordered to appear in a Johnson County court on August 6th.

————————————————————————————-

Documents:

Affidavit of complaint.

Statement by Mountain City,  TN patrolman Kenneth Lane.  He   was the assisting officer at McCloud’s traffic stop.

Statement by Mountain City,  TN patrolman officer Ben May.  He   arrived on scene as McCloud and Lane were talking to Conover (cell phone   photographer).

 

Advertisement

 
View More: No tags are associated with this article
Not what you're looking for? Try our quick search:
 

Advertisement

Reader Reactions

Flag Comment Posted by waldo on August 14, 2008 at 5:35 pm

Sounds like this guy went looking for trouble and found it. The picture taking charge might not hold water, but disorderly conduct sure will. He should have known better than to pull up in the the middle of a cop making a traffic stop. If he just had to have a picture why didn’t he do it at a distance. From what I read he was wanting to instigate trouble. I’m not saying the officer couldn’t have handles this different, but bottom line he placed the cops and himself and his family in danger with his stunt.

Flag Comment Posted by ENHAGER on August 05, 2008 at 6:57 pm

UPDATE: This is a national story and Conover talks about his other brushes with the local law at http://www.photographyisnotacrime.org/

Exclusive photos taken of the arresting officer by Conover’s 12-year-old daughter.

Flag Comment Posted by Maarten on August 01, 2008 at 5:18 pm

In RE: AEOLWIND’s comment.  The onus lies upon the Sheriff [in ancient law terms—the keeper of the community] of that community to discipline this deputy.  It is my opinion, a deputy being a sworn “representative of the court” who acts outside the law (a.k.a. an outlaw) should be removed from duty.  Furthermore, if the Sheriff doesn’t act in the interests of the law and protecting his community and its citizen’s constitutional rights; then the public officials overseeing the sheriff need to act, swiftly, rigorously, and justly.

Flag Comment Posted by Aeolwind on August 01, 2008 at 3:44 pm

The deputy made an unlawful arrest & placed his life in danger.

Reference:  http://www.constitution.org/uslaw/defunlaw.htm

This is a direct violation of the Conover’s 1st amendment rights, take your pick on which one.  You could go Freedom of Press VERY easily.

I sincerely hope the deputy is removed from his position.

Flag Comment Posted by Myra on July 24, 2008 at 12:10 pm

In reading earlier comments about the person that would like to be in court supporting the police - ask yourself this question.. Why should Mr. Conover roll over and accept what the police officer was doing in order to avoid any embarassment for?

Flag Comment Posted by Myra on July 24, 2008 at 12:02 pm

Mr. Conover made the police man mad because he wouldn’t delete the photo - the police man throught he would try to show some authority and arrest him over it. My goodness. Looks like the police man has made a donkey out of hisself!! I think it’s hilarious! I realize that not all law enforcement has this mentality - but the arrogance level of a lot of officers needs to be addressed. Being a police man/woman doesn’t mean you have more rights than the rest of us!!!

Flag Comment Posted by Maarten on July 23, 2008 at 6:12 pm

Lets hope Mr. Conover doesn’t face a Kangaroo Court like the deputy confronting him.  This would appear to me, to only happen in a Banana Republic!  Maarten

Flag Comment Posted by Nik Brown on July 21, 2008 at 11:54 am

I posted this earlier, but some people seem not have read it. (see all comments related to us not posting certain comments).

We approve all comments that do not violate our Terms and Conditions.
http://www.tricities.com/tri/site/terms_and_conditions/

Part of which state that the following are a breach of our Terms:
“obscene, profane, sexually explicit, libelous, slanderous, defamatory, harmful, threatening, illegal or knowingly false User Content;”

Many comments that have not been posted contained much of the above.

Flag Comment Posted by Tomas on July 19, 2008 at 1:33 pm

You mean Starling R. McCloud?

Hopefully Starling will be reprimanded at the least…

This does look bad from the far side of the country, and is NOT the way sworn officers should be allowed to act.

Please do keep us informed on how this farce plays out.

Flag Comment Posted by captainrich on July 18, 2008 at 5:56 pm

Obviously, WJHL reporter Darius Radzius also believes errant police officers should not be named in his news articles. I’m sure the victim would have supplied it…
Is the widdle baby a-scared he might get awwested too?

Post a Comment(Requires free registration)

The commenting period has ended or commenting has been deactivated for this article.
 

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement