Deforestation Caused By Insect Pest Threatens Town’s Water Supply

Deforestation Caused By Insect Pest Threatens Town’s Water Supply

Andre Teague/Bristol Herald Courier

The egg sacks of the Hemlock Woolly Adelgid are evident on the underside of a hemlock branch growing near a creek that helps supply the town of Big Stone Gap with drinking water.

» 1 Comment | Post a Comment

BIG STONE GAP, Va. – An invasive insect that has become a nuisance for much of the Appalachian region is quickly becoming a public utility problem for this Southwest Virginia town.

The woolly adelgid infests hemlock trees, feeding on their sap needle by needle, and – within three or four years for most trees – causing them to die.

The problem for Big Stone Gap? Eastern hemlocks line a creek that carries the town’s water supply from the its reservoir to a water treatment plant, and if the tiny parasite kills the trees, the costs would skyrocket to treat daily the 2.2 million gallons of water used by residents, said Freddie Allison, chairman of the town council’s Public Utilities Committee.

“If we lose the hemlocks, we run into all sorts of problems,” he said.

Worse yet, the town’s options for treating a woolly adelgid infestation are limited.

Biological solutions, which would wipe out the pest by introducing a predator species, are still in development, while chemical solutions either would cause more issues or are expensive, said Anna Hess, environmental director of the Clinch Coalition, a local organization committed to protecting plants and animals in the Jefferson National Forest.

Allison and other town officials discovered the problem earlier this year, and most of the trees, save for the ones in the highest elevations, already are showing signs of infestation.

He foresees four problems the town could face if the hemlocks around the stream are lost. The creek will lose its shade and the increased sunlight will raise the water temperature, which causes treatment to be more difficult; fallen trees will narrow the creek, causing it to flow faster; the decaying trees will increase the water’s turbidity, causing the need for more treatment; and streambed washouts will be more probable.

“I guess if you’re a tree-hugger, losing hemlocks is a problem by itself,” Allison added.

None of the problems would make the water untreatable, but they would certainly increase the treatment costs, said Allison. Town employees are working to calculate the actual numbers, but Allison is confident the amount will not be negligible.

The woolly adelgid was brought accidentally to North America in nursery plants in the 1920s, said Hess. The insect first spread north, then south, and only recently hit Southwest Virginia.

The bug feeds on sap, which it takes from the base of hemlock needles, causing them to fall off. Without its needles, a hemlock tree dies, she said.

Woolly adelgids multiply quickly and can kill small trees within a year or so, Hess said. Large trees may take up to five years to die.

Hemlocks are valuable to many ecosystems. Many plants, such as rhododendron, are dependent on it, she said, and the hemlock has the ability to absorb water during the winter when most trees are dormant, helping reduce spring flooding.

Big Stone Gap has to act soon, Hess warns: “You have to hit it as soon as you find it, or it’s too late.”

Unfortunately, it’s easier said than done.

As a biologist, Hess prefers natural solutions to the use of invasive species. Introducing a species that kills or harms the pest species is a way to “level the playing field,” she said, but invasives are harmful themselves because nothing in the ecosystem threatens them.

The method now showing the most promise is a species of beetle that kills the woolly adelgid, but these Japanese beetles can’t keep up because the adelgid reproduces so fast.

“It isn’t quite up to par yet,” said Hess.

Until better biological solutions are available, Big Stone Gap will have to pursue a chemical solution.

One option is imidacloprid, an insecticide that’s closely related to nicotine and can be administered in a few ways.

In one method, the chemical is sprayed on the soil surrounding the tree. The tree’s roots absorb it and the chemical then moves to the needles. where it is ingested by the woolly adelgid.

Alternatively, imidacloprid could be injected directly into the soil.

But with both methods, the chemical likely would wash into the nearby creek – the town’s water supply – said Allison.

Hess said that when hemlocks are near water, the chemical can be injected in the tree’s roots on the side away from the water, but she doubts the method would be acceptable where municipal drinking water is involved.

The only other remaining option is to inject the chemical directly into the tree’s trunk, a method known as stem injection. Multiple capsules of imidacloprid are placed in the tree, and there’s no worry of the chemical getting into the water.

But the injection stresses the trees and could kill them, Hess said. Additionally, it is by far the most expensive method, estimated to cost between $1 and $1.50 for each inch of a treated tree’s diameter.

Officials also would have to decide which trees in the 70-acre area should be saved – likely thousands. So a cost tally is difficult to determine.

Allison doesn’t know where the town would get the money for such treatment efforts, which will have to be repeated every few years until a biological solution is found.

Hess is hopeful, however, adding that biologists are in the process of testing other beetle species to attack the woolly adelgid problem.

TIMOTHY CAMA is an intern with the Herald Courier and can be reached at or (276) 669-2181.

Advertisement

 
View More: No tags are associated with this article
Not what you're looking for? Try our quick search:
 

Advertisement

Reader Reactions

Flag Comment Posted by Royalty on July 29, 2008 at 11:09 am

Mr. Allison and Ms. Hess’ comments on soil-applied imidacloprid are inaccurate. 

1) Properly applied to soil as per label directions, imidacloprid will bind to soil organic matter near the base of the tree.  The likelihood of the insecticide winding up in streams and in drinking water is virtually nil.  The non-existent risk is further minimized if CoreTect, a newly introduced tablet formulation, is used.

2) The cost of soil-applied imidacloprid ranges from 50 cents to a dollar per inch of tree diameter.  This cost varies depending on the numbers of trees treated, and whether municipalities treat the trees themselves or hire an professional arborist.  This cost is FAR less than the cost of removing hundreds of dead hemlocks.  Hemlock removal will cost thousands of dollars per tree.

Treating makes even more sense from a cost perspective when one realizes that a single treatment will protect a hemlock for at least three years (depending on the dose applied and the size of the hemlock).  And this cost evaluation doesn’t even include the cost to the community and to property values of losing the hemlocks. 

Nor does this discussion of cost take into consideration the environmental devastation caused to riparian areas by the death of the trees.  The impact of hemlock loss on the environment is well
documented by research scientists. 

Mr. Allison is correct to be concerned about the water quality in the reservoir.  If the hemlocks surrounding the above-mentioned reservoir die, the quality of the drinking water in the reservoir will almost certainly be negatively affected.

3) Releasing predatory beetles has shown promise, and may be the long term solution to adelgid management.  Let’s hope so!  Ms. Hess is correct; a sustainable ‘natural’ solution (i.e., a predator or a parasite that maintains the population of an invasive pest at a non-damaging level) is the preferable solution, from the environmental and economic perspective.  But to date, none of the releases of these predators have resulted in a permanent establishment of a beetle population in the wild.  Thus the releases have to be made every year in order to be effective.  At a costs of $3 a beetle, soil insecticide treatments are far more economical, particularly when one considers that the efficacy will last for several years.

4)  The US Forest Service and the National Park Service have been using imidacloprid for years to save hemlocks on public lands.  The product has proven to be very efficacious, and no deleterious effects to the environment have been observed.


Feel free to contact me for any additional information about adelgid management and imidacloprid.  I would also refer you to the research scientists at the US Forest Service in Asheville, NC and Morgantown, WV, the foresters in the Great Smoky Mountains National Park, and the extension entomologists at Virginia Tech University in Blacksburg.  All these scientists have been researching adelgid management extensively over the past few years, and can contribute to the discussion on how to best manage this environmentally-devastating pest.

Nate Royalty
Product Development Manager
Bayer Environmental Science
1-919-549-2532
Nate.Royalty@bayercropscience.com

Post a Comment(Requires free registration)

The commenting period has ended or commenting has been deactivated for this article.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement