Business Closure Called For After Employees Fall Ill from Chemical Smell
Submitted photo
The MXI plant near Interstate 81’s Exit 22.
ABINGDON, Va. – After six weeks of sick employees complaining about a chemical smell in the air, the president of Hapco wants authorities to shut down his industrial neighbor, MXI, if that’s what it takes to stop the illness until the problem can be fixed.
But an MXI official said it’s not to blame for health problems next door, and the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality says while it’s working with the company, testing shows the industrial smell at Exit 22 of Interstate 81 shouldn’t have lasting health effects.
As the testing and finger-pointing continue, the ongoing issue is raising eyebrows in industry and county government as the illness at Hapco persists.
“Our problem is very simple,” said David Oakley, president of Hapco. “While they’re trying to figure out what to do, we’re still getting sick, and it worries me, in fact it scares me, that somebody is going to have symptoms … that is operating heavy equipment and get hurt or get killed because nothing has been done.”
MXI, which is in the industrial area around Exit 22, recycles alcoholic beverages and various household products into alcohol-based fuel. Hapco’s plant, which makes aluminum poles, sits at approximately the same elevation as the exhaust coming from MXI’s cooling tower.
In late April, plant employees went outside and called for help when they were sickened by an odor; earlier this week, they called for help again when everyone on second shift began having symptoms.
Kalonn Roberts, spokeswoman for Hapco, says employees have become ill from the smell many times in between; Production Manager Dave Meadows says the problem began in February or March and worsened, affecting production.
Brian Potter, operations manager for MXI, said that while the smell appears to be emanating from a new process installed earlier this year to recycle water at MXI, the products processed there are things like beer and perfume and should not make people sick.
“I can’t speak to what else is going on up there at their facility,” Potter said of Hapco. “I know what’s going on here, and I know that none of us are sick.”
Potter describes the plant’s odor as “a perfume smell, something like dryer sheets.” He added that for the last month his company has been using a chemical that he says has been effective in reducing the smell.
He says complaints have been made even when his facility is not operating – and he’s offered to change plant scheduling if that would help.
“We’ve had no adverse health effects at our facility at all, and therefore, we believe our process isn’t creating them,” Potter said. “I think there’s lots of potential sources of pollution in this industrial park. I think they should be exploring them all.”
At Hapco, employees blame the smell from MXI for symptoms that result in being “very dizzy,” said Meadows.
“You lose a lot of your motor skills,” he said, adding that employees complain of “nausea, drowsiness, fatigue, dry throat, itchy throat, real lightheaded dizziness, about any complication you can think of from the consumption of alcohol.”
Roberts said employees also complain of nausea, headaches, respiratory troubles, nosebleeds and a metal taste in the mouth.
The issue has even made its way to the Washington County Board of Supervisors, which discussed it during last Wednesday’s meeting.
“They have to take care of it,” said Jack McCrady, vice chairman of the board. “People can’t be allowed to go to work to earn a living and get sick.”
The board took no action on the issue.
An anonymous caller Thursday pointed the finger at a piece of equipment at Hapco that is being looked at by DEQ to determine whether it meets the criteria for additional regulation.
Hapco says the issue centers on whether it should be classified as an evaporator or an incinerator, and until this week, it hasn’t been operational since March or April.
Crystal Bazyk, air compliance specialist for DEQ’s southwest regional office in Abingdon, said no action has been taken against Hapco.
She says DEQ has been working with MXI since April to mitigate the odor and has tested air quality on MXI property, in the area of the plume coming from MXI’s cooling tower.
“Dr. Tripathi concluded the concentrations detected in the grab samples were very low and did not exceed the health-based level of concern,” Bazyk said, reading from an e-mail received from the office of State Toxicologist Ram Tripathi. “Therefore, exposures are not expected to result in any adverse health effects.”
She said results should be ready next week from another test, this time done on Hapco property where employees say the smell is making them sick.
“If someone feels like there is an issue with another facility, I would suggest that they get in contact with us,” Bazyk said.
At MXI, Potter said his plant has an environmentally friendly focus, taking products that would otherwise be dumped into a landfill and turning them into renewable fuel.
At Hapco, Oakley says he’s invited OSHA in to look at the problem and he’s called a Thursday meeting to discuss the issue with representatives of other nearby industries, which he says are experiencing the smell as well.
“We’ve having outside testing agencies come in and provide 24-hour monitoring both inside and outside,” he said. “We’re going to do everything within our legal power to get this smell out of our building.”
| (276) 791-0701
Advertisement
Reader Reactions
You still did not answer my question. What do you think you are breathing in your own plant? I did read that Hapco is being investigated, as well.
First hot gases rise, cool, and if dense settle. thats whats been happening.
Second, this is what we have been breathing.
These are a few of the most common compounds as listed by the EPA (compiled from a study in 1991)
ACETONE CNS depressent coordination issues
BENZALDEHYDE CNS Depresent kidney Damage
BENZYL ACETATE Carcinogen Linked to pancreatic Cancer
BENZYL ALCOHOL Carcinogen systemic CNS Failer
ETHYL ACETATE Anemia and Kidney damage
METHYLENE CHLORIDE Carcenogen, hedaches fatique tingling of limbs,
a-TERPINEOL loss of muscular coordination ,
g-TERPINENE CNS disorders.
Should we not be concerned? Is This not Perfume?
That’s easy for you to say, considering you would not be the person losing your job. In today’s economy you can’t simply go out and get another job. It’s just not possible. You sound like a Hapco worker. What do you think you could be breathing in your plant? Do you not think it is strange that none of us have gotten sick? I feel all the companies having this sickness need to be investigated.
I see that action is being taken, but my concern still is what have we been breathing for the past several months.
I obviously dont want to see anyone loose there job but when you force people who dont have a choice to breath possible toxins, something needs to be done. it may sound insensitive but better a few loose there jobs than one loose his life. you can find another job but lives are hard to come by.
Lets face it you guys dont have a good track record. how many chemical fires have you had in 10 years? at least 3 that have required FD response.
Well, first off I certainly hope that you or anyone else do not want to see us hard workers out a job. I wanted you and everyone else to see our point of view. Our concern is that I or no other workers from MXI have not suffered any of the symptoms reported and feel we are simply being targeted. Yes we do feel this is by your company as well as others. I also want to point out that the company just invested a good deal of money to try to deal with the smell. You mentioned that your company has had symptoms. Was it nose bleeds and everything else that Hapco has experienced? Please keep in mind while answering this question that I know employees from your plant and already know their point of view.
I would like to say thank you for your help that day. Yes I do know it was a paint fire that day, I DO not know why my gear and my partners gear smelled so bad of perfum after the fire. I do not know why it took so long to get it out of our gear but it did.
I’m glad that you didn’t feel bad afterwards but myself and my partner did.
I am not againts MXI and I wish people wouldn’t think that. I believe something has changed in some process somewwhere and with everyone working on it I’m sure it will be figured out and a fix found. I do NOT want to see one person put out of work in this county, we can’t afford that and that is NOT my goal.
I want to see DEQ finish with the test and implement whatever solution will fix whatever the problem is. If it traced back to MXI then I have faith that they will fix it. Do you not agree??
I would like to first off respond to Fireman RICK. Just so you know, I am the man who pulled the firehose for you and put it in your hand. I find it strange that you had these symptoms, when I was standing right behind you with no protective gear on and had no problems at all. (And by the way this was a paint fire and no perfume was involved in any way.) P.S. I only had to wash my clothes once. Explain that Mr. Fireman Ricky.
It isn’t just Hapco. Try going down to Sterling Casket or across the street to Minks when the smell is bad.
I don’t see how people living in this area can handle it. Maybe they’ve become immune to the smell?
just thought I would mention that I was at MXI today and there was nothing there in the air….how did they hide that odor???I was there picking up some papers but I didnt smell a thing??? So what do you think is up??
Thought everyone should know. found this at preventcancer.com
The National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health has reported that the fragrance industry uses up to 3000 ingredients, predominantly synthetic, some 900 of which were identified as toxic. However, the industry is not required to disclose ingredients of fragrances and perfumes on their labels due to trade secrecy considerations.
An analysis of six different mainstream perfumes by Scientific Instrument Services, released in November 1998, identified over 800 ingredients with distinctive patterns for each perfume. These ingredients include a wide range of volatile and semi-volatile organic chemicals which are thus a significant contributors to indoor air pollution.
Scientific Instruments Services and the cosmetic industry’s Research Institute of Fragrance Materials Laboratory. Of all 41 ingredients identified, no toxicity data are available on some, data on most are inadequate, and others are known to be toxic to the skin, mucous membranes, respiratory tract, and reproductive and nervous systems by routes including skin absorption and inhalation. Additionally, two ingredients (phenylmethyl acetic acid ester and 2,6–bis (1,1–dimethylethyl) –4–methyl–phenol) were identified as carcinogens


Advertisement