Budget cuts could lead to the early release of 3,300 Tennessee prisoners

Budget cuts could lead to the early release of 3,300 Tennessee prisoners

Nate Morabito/11 Connects

» 4 Comments | Post a Comment

With a $1.5 billion budget shortfall becoming more and more of a possibility in Tennessee, desperate times are calling for desperate measures. Governor Phil Bredesen is asking state agencies to make deep budget cuts of up to nine percent for the 2010 budget year. The Tennessee Department of Correction was among the first to present its plan to the governor this week. Commissioner George Little’s proposed cuts are still sending shockwaves across the state.

Little told Bredesen in order to cut $53 million from his budget, the Department of Correction would have to set 3,300 inmates free earlier than expected.

“Frankly, we’re at the point now where there isn’t anything else to give other than beds,” Little said. “If it wasn’t for the budget, we wouldn’t be talking about any sort of early releases.“

When Little presented his budget to the governor Monday, he told Bredesen “non-violent” offenders (burglars, robbers, and drug dealers) who are nearing the end of their sentences would be in line to be released.

“If we have to accept the full $53 million in cuts, we would have to release offenders early,” Little said.

The news comes as a shock to area sheriffs. After all, their counties contract with the state to house state inmates.

“I realize cost and things are important, but it’s a great concern to us because of public safety,” Carter County Sheriff Chris Mathes said. “If those folks, even a small portion of them, go back into the crime field so to speak and habitually start committing crimes, your property damage, your insurance costs, your thefts, your losses are going to skyrocket.”

A combined 157 state prisoners call the Carter, Washington, and Unicoi County jails home. Of those prisoners, dozens would likely qualify for early release under Little’s plan. Sheriffs in those counties fear that plan could be a recipe for disaster.

“If you were a victim, the last thing you want to see is someone who gets sentenced to three or four years to get out because of a financial situation,” Washington County Sheriff Ed Graybeal said. “If the person gets out of jail and doesn’t serve that time and doesn’t realize what they did was wrong, they’re probably going to be a repeat offender. That’s what worries me more than anything. After we go to all the trouble to convict these people and to incarcerate these people, I think there needs to be a better plan.“

That is up to Governor Bredesen to decide. The governor now has until January to nail down his budget and think about its possible effects. At the beginning of 2010, he will present his recommendations to the state legislature.

The Department of Correction says the 2010 budget could be a sign of things to come.

“We’re going to set the tone now for the next 10 years and this budget situation that Tennessee’s in is not going to go away next year,” Little said.

According to Little, that’s especially concerning since the state projects the prison population will increase by 4,000 to 5,000 inmates by the end of next decade.

Advertisement

 
View More: No tags are associated with this article
Not what you're looking for? Try our quick search:
 

Advertisement

Reader Reactions

Flag Comment Posted by chesapeake65 on November 18, 2009 at 12:02 am

In reading this article one must consider all sides of the matter, both pro and con. The premise asserted that releasing inmates early would mean increased crime because these individuals may not have learned their lesson so to speak, is a bit thought provoking to me. What would releasing non-violent offenders early matter as far as learning their lesson. These individuals would either be released and commit crime again no matter when they were released. I am sure the criteria would be set and I am sure no one would be released all that early. My point is that these are really hard times and cuts need to be made across the board. It is not easy, and I am sure the decision to ask for early releases was not an easy one. But in fairness, I do not think it is such a big deal. Criminals are released every day and they will either straighten up or not, no matter what time they served. I now this is probably not a popular opinion on the matter and will provoke such replies as “what if one of these people offended again and it involved someone in your family or you?“. Crime happens every day and is not discriminate. I just think if we have to be careful with money and make the best of it, then releasing non-violent folks a little early is not such a far fetched idea. THIN ABOUT THIS: the number in custody now is one thing, and is only going to go up. If it were murderers or rapists then it would be a different story altogether.

Flag Comment Posted by server on November 17, 2009 at 10:18 pm

OMG,What the heck are these people thinking.Lets cut back on their pay to save money.We pay these people the big buck to come up with stupid Ideas like this.Let the punishment fit the crime.That will save the people alot of time and money.

Flag Comment Posted by 4real on November 17, 2009 at 9:06 pm

wow, now everyone has something real to debate. its not like your cat killers, or your football players, or even your red-light cameras. am i hearing that TN. is so poor we cant house the convicted? i saw i nice dedication for a justice center i think last week. let punishment fit the crime. i know up until the last election a shell was 29sense. thats alot different than 29$ a day.

Flag Comment Posted by commonsense on November 17, 2009 at 6:41 pm

THINK ABOUT THIS NEXT TIME YOU SAY YOU DON’T BELIEVE IN CAPITAL PUNISHMENT…

IN TIME, AS TIME PASSES, THEY WILL BEGIN TO RELEASE THOSE IN PRISON FOR ‘LIFE WITHOUT PAROLE’ BECAUSE THEY DON’T HAVE SPACE FOR ALL OF THEM.

JUST THINK ABOUT IT ...!!!

Post a Comment(Requires free registration)

The commenting period has ended or commenting has been deactivated for this article.
 

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement