Bluff City’s Photo Enforcement Cameras Coming Soon
BLUFF CITY, Tenn. – As city officials chose the company they want to provide speed-enforcement cameras, Police Chief David Nelson said Thursday it will be at least four months before the devices are installed along a 2-mile section of U.S. 11E.
In a 4-1 vote, the Bluff City Board of Mayor and Aldermen chose American Traffic Systems to serve as its camera vendor. The company provides traffic-enforcement cameras to 150 communities in the United States and Canada, company spokesman Josh Weiss said.
“The whole point of photo enforcement is to modify driver behavior,” Weiss said. Overall, Weiss said, his company’s traffic cameras have resulted in 40 percent to 50 percent drops in traffic violations and a 30 percent drop in crashes.
Nelson and other city officials said they’d like to see similar results along the section of U.S. 11E that runs from Pardner’s Bar-B-Que and Steak Restaurant to the Piney Flats Crossroads.
The heavily traveled stretch is plagued with speeders, Nelson said Thursday, citing results of a traffic study he asked Bristol Tennessee Traffic Engineer David Metzger to conduct for the city in January.
According to the study, 114,991 vehicles passed between Pardner’s and the Crossroads between Jan. 9 and Jan. 14. Their average speed was 47.9 mph, about 3 mph over the limit for that part of U.S. 11E.
But the study also showed that almost 9 percent of those drivers were doing at least 10 mph over of the limit: 10,336 of them were doing 55 mph or higher; 143 were doing more than 65 mph; and 12 were doing 75 mph or more.
In the past, Nelson said, he’s assigned one of his officers to patrol this strip of highway on a 24-hour basis. But after the board cut the police force from 10 officers to eight when it passed its budget this summer, Nelson said he’s no longer been able to do that. That’s why he’s looking at cameras, he said.
In December, Nelson and Alderman Don Weaver introduced the idea of putting speed cameras on U.S. 11E, especially when it comes to the 45-mph zone between Pardner’s and the Crossroads.
Many of the business owners on that highway have been complaining about the speeders, Weaver said Thursday. The city had to do something to ease these concerns, he said, because “most of our taxes come from that area.”
On April 10, the board approved, in a 4-1 vote, the resolution allowing the use of traffic enforcement cameras to catch speeders and people who run red lights in the city. But Weaver said the current proposal covers only the 45 mph section of U.S. 11E. It does not include putting cameras downtown, Weaver said, attempting to contradict rumors to the contrary he said were spreading through town.
Aldermen Melvin Carrier cast Thursday’s lone vote against choosing American Traffic Systems to supply the cameras. Carrier also cast the only dissenting vote at the board’s April 10 meeting.
“A lot of citizens I’ve talked to say they don’t want [the cameras],” Carrier said Thursday. “I mean, every citizen I’ve talked to.”
Both times a vote on the cameras has come up, Carrier has tried to delay the decision until after the city’s May 19 election, when voters will cast ballots for mayor and three of the board’s five seats.
One candidate in the election, Robert Miller, has made speed cameras an issue for his campaign. At the April 10 meeting, Miller asked whether the city was “turning to the cameras because of the downturn in the economy.”
Miller also asked whether the city would be charged anything if the cameras did not produce enough money.
Weiss said Thursday there are no minimum amounts specified in the contract his company has with its municipal partners.
Nelson said developing that contract is the next hurdle city officials must overcome in their quest to put the cameras in place. He said the city’s attorney will meet with American Traffic Systems’ attorney to nail down the details. That would include determining how much of the $90 in fines and court costs would go to Weiss’ company.
Once they’ve finalized the agreement and voted on it, city officials and American Traffic Systems will have to get the permits needed for the cameras from the Tennessee Department of Transportation, Nelson said, estimating the entire process could take four to five months.
| (276) 645-2518
Advertisement
Reader Reactions
I guess what bothers me the most is the cameras convict the owner of the car as a civil matter, not the driver of the car as a criminal matter. It just seems like a violation of due process. Someday, the US Supreme will eventually rule on this.
No…I live here…I’m just looking dumb about the roads numbers…I grew up here…moved away to Florida for several years…and recently moved back.
Sounds like a good idea to me. Everyone wants to complain that the police do nothing about crime. It’s a proven fact there are not enough police in the communities. So go for the cameras were the crime is, every street corner every neighborhood is fine if there is crime there. The cameras are being installed where crime is occurring on a daily basis. If there is crime in your home, maybe you need them in your home. That’s why there are security cameras. Technology has changed the world.
So when you complain about someone speeding in your neighborhood they can be charged. 11E is my neighborhood and I don’t appreciate everyone driving through like it is a race track, what if I did it your neighborhood? No, I am not perfect, I make mistakes driving just like anyone else, but I respect other peoples rights on the road. If I do something stupid and get caught by a camera, oh well, it’s my fault.
The privilege to drive in TN., is just that a Privilege granted by the state. It is not someones rights, it can be taken away for not obeying the laws.
Hey Dolfan—-They are talking about 11-E here, not 11-W. Are you from out of state ?
Sure…put them up from one end of 11W to the other. Why not on every street…and every street corner…and while their at it…how about in every home…why not every room.
If there are cameras everywhere we can stop crimes and stop people from endangering the lives of others.
Well at very least…someone can make some money off it.
There have been several people killed or serious injured on 11E. That is one of the reasons for the new traffic light. If drivers weren’t speeding maybe some could have been avoided. The speeding problem is not in the 45 mph zone, everyone knows the police watch it closely. The speeding is a problem on the rest of the highway from Bristol to Johnson City. Putting the cameras up on the whole stretch would be fine with me.
And of course its about revenue, everything is these days. But if it costs someone who speeds a little money to make the road safer for the law abiding drivers, so be it.
HOW MANY PEOPLE HAVE DIED IN THE SUPPOSED DEATH-TRAP SECTION IN DIRE NEED OF SPEED CAMERAS TO SAVE LIVES?
IT’S ABOUT THE REVENUE…NOT SAFETY!!!!!!
Mr. Lon Gene Leonard needs to clarify this rumor going around in Bluff City. Did you or did you not take government possessions when you worked at the job corp. Stand up for youself Mr. Leonard and set the record straight. Tell the citizens in Bluff City the real truth as Alderman Melvin Carrier has stated to the citizens about you. You need to defend yourself if you want to be our mayor…..WE WANT THE TRUTH BEFORE WE VOTE YOU IN OFFICE TO REPRESENT OUR CITY…..
Any voter in Bluff City that would vote for Lon Gene Leonard for Mayor of Bluff City has poor taste in Politics.
If you remember, Lon Gene Leonard has failed in all attemps to get voted in as an alderman in Bluff City along with the recall that also failed. Mr. Leonard is a joke period !!!!
Listen up friends, this speed camera issue is the platform being used by the people trying to get on the board in Bluff City. The statitcs noted that “143 vehicles were traveling at 55 mph or higher “. This is enough in itself to justify speed cameras. I’ve lived in Bluff City for a long time and I personnaly know this strectch of highway is a safety hazard. Alderman Melvin Carrier is a has-been when it comes to good common sense. This guy is mentally sick when it comes to running the city. He shows he is against the speed cameras in Bluff City along this strecth of highway. Carrier has an issue against the members of the board. He wants to have a new board, nothing else matters to him !!! This present board has done an outstanding good job for the citizens in Bluff City. So why change faces ???
CARRIER NEEDS TO GO !!!!He is a complete idiot. This guy Robert Miller is only trying to cause confusion in the upcoming election. Pay him no never mind. O’Dell is obsolete in her thinking and motives. She is obsolete in todays world. Like Dr. Hooker stated, he deals with victims of auto accidents daily, he knows how it is. If we drive the speed limit and respect the speed limit law, what is the big deal ???? This is not an issue of grave concern for the citizens that obey the law whether it is speed cameras or anything we do on a daily basis to respect the law. This speed camera issue does not pertain to the law abiding citizen. It only pertains to the people that believe they are above the law set forth for all of us. This present board has the ingredients to keep us safe in harms way, the candidates seeking office has nothing to offer the voters in Bluff City !!!!!!!!


Advertisement