Bluff City to start issuing warning citations to speeding motorists caught on camera

Bluff City to start issuing warning citations to speeding motorists caught on camera

David Crigger|Bristol Herald Courier

Drivers hit their brakes as they pass Bluff City’s new speed cameras Monday afternoon. A special “warning citation” will be mailed to drivers caught speeding by the cameras starting today. Offending motorists will be fined come January.

» 47 Comments | Post a Comment

BLUFF CITY, Tenn. – A flashing light pole caught Kenny Hensley by surprise Monday as he drove up U.S. Highway 11E toward Bristol following an afternoon trip to Johnson City.

Attached to the light pole, about 200 yards from Pardner’s Bar-B-Que and Steak restaurant, is one of two speed cameras Bluff City police officers installed last month to watch drivers who travel the northbound and southbound lanes of U.S. 11E.

And every time its light flashed, Police Chief David Nelson said, the camera caught a vehicle exceeding the highway’s 45 mph speed limit and took its picture.

“If they’re not speeding, they don’t have anything to worry about,” Nelson said.

Starting today, registered owners of speeding vehicles will get a written warning. That grace period will last for one month.

Then beginning Jan. 1, police officers will start citing those caught speeding and they will be charged $90 per offense.

“I think it’s crazy,” said Hensley, one of several customers at Pardner’s for lunch Monday who said they are upset about the cameras.

Speeding has always been a problem on U.S. 11E, Nelson said, especially where the speed limit drops from 55 mph to 45 mph on a heavily traveled 3.8-mile stretch of the highway between Pardner’s and the Piney Flats crossroads.

The city asked Bristol Tennessee Traffic Engineer David Metzger to illustrate this problem by conducting a traffic study in January. Nelson said the study found that 9 percent of the 114,991 vehicles that passed through between Jan. 9 and Jan. 16 were traveling at least 55 mph, 143 vehicles were going 65 mph and another 12 were doing 75 mph or more. The average vehicle was traveling 47.9 mph, according to Metzger’s study.

With these figures in hand, Nelson pushed to install speed cameras, following the lead of police in Mount Carmel and Red Bank, Tenn.

The city’s Board of Mayor and Aldermen voted 4-1 in April to hire American Traffic Solutions to set up the speed cameras and signed a contract with the company in July.
Under the terms of this contract, Finance Director Judy Dulaney said, the city will charge speeders a $50 civil fine and a $40 administrative fee, which will go to ATS for installing the cameras and collecting the fines.

The board anticipated the cameras would bring in $50,000 of new revenue over the current fiscal year when it approved the city’s budget over the summer. But that number is now not certain because it was based on an assumption that the cameras would go live in August rather than January, Dulaney said.

But whatever amount of money the cameras bring in to city coffers, it will be enough to bother Ernie and Betty Noonkester, who referred to the speed cameras as a “money racket” while at Pardner’s for lunch Monday.

The couple travel 11E every day – he has a delivery route and she works as a nurse in Johnson City – and they’ve got different reasons for not liking the new cameras.

While they may catch speeders, Betsy Noonkester said, the cameras don’t do anything to catch people who drive without insurance, which she said is a bigger problem and more of a burden on taxpayers than speeding.

The cameras also aren’t fair, said Ernie Noonkester, who claims that if a city police officer wants to cite a person for speeding: “They should have to catch you.”

Nelson countered this claim by saying the city makes more money from speeding tickets when it puts a police officer on patrol than it will from a camera. Those caught speeding by officers have to pay $123.50 in fines and court costs, he said.

They’re also charged with a moving violation, the police chief said, which can have a negative impact on a driving record and insurance rates. Speed camera citations are non-moving violations and do not affect a person’s driving record.

Dulaney said speed camera citations can be appealed in traffic court the same way a normal speeding ticket is appealed. But, she said, the citation becomes a moving violation and affects a driving record, if the person is found guilty.

Nelson said the city also benefits from the cameras because they free up officers normally assigned to patrol 11E.
Jeff Huff, a Bristol, Tenn,, resident and Pardner’s patron Monday, cited this exact reason when he explained why he supports the new speed cameras.

“It’s a good idea,” Huff said, adding that he’s worried about the danger speeders cause for those entering and leaving businesses like Pardner’s.
“This is a pretty straight stretch that people can get going a good speed on,” he said.

| (276) 645-2518

Advertisement

 
View More: No tags are associated with this article
Not what you're looking for? Try our quick search:
 

Advertisement

Reader Reactions

Flag Comment Posted by earnhardt3 on December 02, 2009 at 10:23 am

i’m sorry im still ticked.  this is just wrong bluff city.  “big brother” is destroying this country, and any type of traffic camera is just another extension of “BIG GOVERNMENT”.  its just wrong people.  slow cars don’t keep you from injury, ask tiger woods.  if it is your time, then the good Lord will take you.  stop trying to control everything!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!  let us live our lives.

Flag Comment Posted by zwolf on December 02, 2009 at 12:22 am

If the avg. speed was 47 mph, and many were running 65- then it sounds like Bluff City needs to RAISE the speed limit in that area to accomodate the traffic flow. You don’t need to be a traffic scientist to figure that one out….lol

Bottom line.. it’s all about BUCK$.

Flag Comment Posted by Aunt Mable on December 01, 2009 at 11:14 pm

Bluff City makes the news more often than New York City. Wonder what will be next on the agenda?

Flag Comment Posted by stu92 on December 01, 2009 at 9:45 pm

Here’s and idea. Put a camera or sensor in every car and every time you exceed the speed limit, you will get 100 dollar fine in the mail.

Flag Comment Posted by commonsense on December 01, 2009 at 8:09 pm

et al

It’s very obvious to me that Bluff City bought the presentation from the ‘camera people’ that they can redeploy officers and increase their revenue from speeding tickets in that zone.

IT IS A SPEED TRAP !  And, while race weekends are one scenario, we have to live with them 52/365/24/7 !

I’ll go out of my way to avoid getting a ticket at 47 in a 45 zone.  I’m a careful driver, but don’t care the think quite that hard.

Adios, Bluff City- You didn’t BLUFF me at all!!

BTW- they won’t redeploy officers- they’ll just eat more donuts.

Flag Comment Posted by boston on December 01, 2009 at 7:37 pm

First I would like to make sure these fines are handled without predigest,whether it is county cop,state cop or the president or BRUTON SMITH,Bristol thought ticket sales were down before wait till the fans see this.

Flag Comment Posted by Buster on December 01, 2009 at 7:21 pm

Good evening all,
Although there is great merit in making any road safer to travel I am not sure that is the complete intent of some concerned. I for one am not intimidated by the cameras or do not feel that my personal rights are being violated in any way. I also agree that our police force is small and may not be able to adequately patrol all areas but I must disagree with a couple of other points!

Big Brother, with all due respect I completely disagree with your comment and I will gladly outline why. I am in no way partial to Frye but the whole “firing” was wrongly handled and so was the “hiring” of the new attorney. Weaver is not and will not ever be either qualified to manage the town and that is already evident from reports during his short tenure.

The speed cameras are just another act in the grand play which is rapidly become an episode of the Dukes of Hazzard! What next? Weaver will disguse himself as a manager and use the sneaky trick cameras to bring us all to justice? This turns good business away from us! We all for the most part are honest, law abiding and care for others but on the outside we now even moreso look like idiots!

What needs to happen is this: Change the town’s business plan and model, hire or elect (or both) competent and qualified leaders and begin a positive public realtions campaign to better our town immediately! We must have new business, commerce and industry and will not get it buy running it off with unqualified leaders, speed cameras and no temporary relief of taxes, water and sewer taps and open invitations to build and live here.

As previously stated, new business plan, better leadership, ecomonic development and historical preservation not traps, tricks, shell games and con artists to run them. Just good old fashion marketing and hard work. LETS GET STARTED!

Flag Comment Posted by EaTn on December 01, 2009 at 7:18 pm

While coming back from the SC beach a few years back, I decided to take a short cut instead of using the interstate.  In the dozens of wide spots in the road places with speed traps, I managed to get caught in one to the tune of $150.  The officer told me if I paid cash that day, they would reduce it to $125.  I told him I din’t have that much cash and he kindly pointed out the only business that just happened to have a money machine as part of the convenience store.  I hope our area does not degrade to this level of bleeding through-travellers to keep their local govt in business.

Flag Comment Posted by Gmaww on December 01, 2009 at 6:59 pm

Bluff City..hmmmm I am still trying to figure out how a wide place in the road can call itself a town, build a brand new police station, hire a whole bunch of officers and equip them all with new patrol cars when the so called town doesn’t have anything in it to support this extravagance. A town needs businesses, stores, utilities, services, and people to spend money in them to thrive.  Now we find out that the new $peed cameras are going to further pad the pockets of ...who??
I have lived in the Piney Flats area almost 40 years and honestly can’t believe the people around here are not totally up in arms at this showing of “Big Brother” watching us. I drive this road at least twice every day. There is speeding that happens on this 4 lane road, partly because it goes from 55 MPH to 45 MPH rather quickly. But Bluff City has plenty of brand new cruisers to patrol the area. What are they going to be doing now that a piece of equipment is doing their job for them? Folks, Let’s all attend the next town hall meeting in Bluff City and let them know what we think of the new addition to our neighborhood! One person can’t be heard, but together we can make our feelings about these $peed Cameras known! And if Bluff City is truly a town like it claims to be, they will listen to the majority rule.

Flag Comment Posted by saywhat on December 01, 2009 at 5:02 pm

Dr Hooker/Big Mouth/Big Brother

Please pick one screen name and stick to it.  You already been called out for trolling by the TriCities.com staff once already.

I guess you are of the opinion that rules are only for other people to follow and not yourself.  Probably why you support the BMA so viciously.  They seem to break a lot of laws too.

Post a Comment(Requires free registration)

The commenting period has ended or commenting has been deactivated for this article.
 

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement