Residents Point Finger at Commissioner over Road Woes

Residents Point Finger at Commissioner over Road Woes

Earl Neikirk/Bristol Herald Courier

Sullivan County Commissioner Dwight King stands next to one of his logging trucks in Piney Flats, Tenn.

» 18 Comments | Post a Comment

BLUFF CITY, Tenn. – Karla Toler remembers the spring of 2007 in three ways.

It was that spring when she and her husband went to Michigan on vacation and when the couple finally decided to pave the driveway in front of their house near the corner of Stanfield Road and Old Elizabethton Highway.

It also was the spring when the Sullivan County Highway Department finished widening a part of Stanfield Road that runs right by their house.

Today, you can’t tell from looking at that section of road that it was just two years ago that it was widened and paved.

Deep cracks crisscross the road’s surface, giving it what county Highway Commissioner Allen Pope said is a texture akin to “alligator skin.”

Its uneven surface rises and sinks several times as it heads toward the Tolers’ side of the street, where one final ripple threatens to drop chunks of two-year-old asphalt into a drainage ditch that runs along the edge of their property.

“It seems like [the road’s] been breaking down,” Toler said. “It was about a year ago that the road started showing [such wear and tear].”

And it was about a year ago, she said, that a group of logging trucks began making three to four trips each day past her house before they turned on to Old Elizabethton Road.

Those logging trucks belong to Volunteer Logging and Excavating, a Bluff City business co-owned by County Commissioner Dwight King of Piney Flats.

And those trucks have created some problems for King, especially since he and 12 other commissioners cast votes last month that killed a plan that would have given the highway department $500,000 for paving county roads.

Recent anonymous calls to the highway department and posts made to this and other area newspaper Web sites, demand that King repay the county the amount of money it takes to repair the damaged road.

Pope and other highway officials are taking these complaints seriously and said they’d like to work out a deal with King to fix Stanfield Road, even though they also admit bad timing more than anything else is to blame for the damage.

King said if he’s responsible for the damage, he’ll happily comply with the residents’ wishes. But he also said the situation is nothing more than “straight politics” stirred up by people who want to divide the commission.

Stanfield Road

Stanfield Road cuts a 0.9-mile-long swath between some farmland and a few homes due southeast of downtown Bluff City as it connects Timber Ridge Road with the Old Elizabethton Highway.

When the highway department built the road in the 1970s, Pope said, it had a design flaw that created almost 40 years of headaches for both highway officials and the people living on Toler’s side of the street.

The original Stanfield Road was 20 feet wide, or wide enough for two cars traveling in the opposite direction, until it reached a point about 1,000 feet east of the Old Elizabethton Highway intersection. After this point, the road was only 12 feet wide and barely wide enough for one car to traverse at a time.

“It was just one of the many one-lane roads in this county,” Pope said.

Five families, including the Tolers, bought land on this one-lane portion of Stanfield Road and started building homes, he said. It was about this time that the highway department started getting calls about the road’s condition.

Pope said a lot of these people said they were tired of pulling off to the side of the road or backing up when a car came in the opposite direction.

Stanfield Road residents also were worried about what might happen to inexperienced drivers who didn’t know how or where the road ended and who might run off the road
at night, he said.

Pope said at that time the county wanted to improve Stanfield Road but couldn’t because highway officials couldn’t convince landowners to give up the front edges of their property as right-of-way needed for the road widening.

But that changed in August 2006, when Pope was elected highway commissioner and King won his seat on the County Commission. Using personal relationships both men had with one of the landowners, Pope and King said they were able to get the right-of-way needed.

The county secured this land by giving the family enough money to build a fence along the side of their property, Pope said. Construction on the road-widening project started in the fall of 2006, he said.

“We’re the ones who got the road in there in the first place,” King said. “Now people are saying I’m the one that’s been tearing it up.”

Bad timing

There are three phases to a county road-building project after highway officials design it and secure the rights-of-way, Pope said. Highway crews first dig out a road bed and lay down enough rock and gravel to provide the pavement’s surface with a solid and level foundation.

They then spread a layer of asphalt and tar on top of the road bed that’s known as a binder coat and is 2 inches thick. Once this coat sets in, crews put down a surface coat that’s 1 to 1.5 inches thick.

Pope said county highway crews usually don’t put down a road’s surface coat until a year after they’ve put down the binder so they can see if the road bed has any soft or trouble spots as it undergoes normal wear and tear.

Highway crews put down the second lane’s rock and gravel road bed in the fall of 2006 and finished putting down the project’s binder coat in the spring of 2007. The road bed and binder coat involved $6,000 worth of asphalt and $6,000 to $8,000 worth of labor from 15 highway workers, Pope said.

But before the county could put down the surface coat and finish the project, King and Volunteer Logging started logging 15 acres of wooded land on a piece of property on Stanfield Road about 1.5 miles east of Old Elizabethton Highway.

King said his company worked on the project for about a month from March to April in 2008.

Each day during that period, Volunteer’s trucks carried four 80,000-pound loads of timber down Stanfield Road to mills in Tennessee, North Carolina and Virginia, he said.

King said a logging truck can weigh about 130,000 pounds when it is fully loaded. The state has no laws barring a truck of this size from traveling down a street like Stanfield Road and his company had no way of knowing about the road’s weak or incomplete condition until it was too late, he said.

“I’ve worked in probably 100 miles of this area and I’ve never torn any roads up,” King said.

He added that Volunteer’s trucks haven’t been down the road since they finished the job last spring and there’s evidence other trucks have used the road since his company finished the job.

“The problem is that there wasn’t enough asphalt put down [on that part of Stanfield Road]. If it had been completed the way it should have been, there never would have been a problem,” King said.

Pope also said the road’s condition had a lot to do with its damage. Except for two trouble spots at the top of the hill that highway officials are blaming on a leaking water main, Pope said Stanfield Road’s only problems exist where the highway department left off its second coat of pavement.

The bottom part of the road also suffered some drainage problems, Pope said, which the highway department fixed.

“If there’s a bad place like that on a road, a truck will find it,” Pope said. “In a way, this is a blessing in disguise because it showed us where a bad place was at.”

Straight politics

Stanfield Road residents started complaining about their street’s deteriorating condition before Chistmas, said David Campbell, a section foreman with the highway department.

Those complaints picked up quickly after the March 16 County Commission meeting, when Pope and County Commissioner John McKamey of Piney Flats made a plea to get more money for the highway department’s paving operations. At the meeting, Pope said he would have to suspend all county paving operations until the next fiscal year because he had spent almost all of the money in his department’s paving fund earlier in the year.

When Pope finished his plea, McKamey asked commissioners to take $500,000 out of the county’s reserve accounts and put it in the highway department’s paving fund.
The commission’s Budget Committee, of which King is a member, took that amount of money out of the paving fund when the county’s budget was approved in September, McKamey said.

Despite the arguments, 13 of the county’s 24 commissioners, including King, voted down McKamey’s proposal. At one point, King accused McKamey of grandstanding at the March meeting.

“Why was [McKamey’s request] brought out as a motion on the floor instead of going through the committees like a normal budget resolution?” King asked last week. “Let’s talk about this stuff before we do it.”

McKamey, contacted by phone Friday, refused to comment about the Stanfield Road issue, saying he must continue to work with King and doesn’t want to get involved.

King’s stance on the paving issue has drawn a lot of criticism from several of McKamey’s allies, who have been writing letters to newspapers, posting comments on Web sites and calling the highway department to make something that happened a year ago an issue today.

“To be honest with you, I didn’t know anything about [the Stanfield Road situation] until I heard all of these complaints,” Pope said, adding that his office has been paying close attention to the paving fund debate since it started.

Pope said he hopes the department and King’s company can come up with a solution to Stanfield Road’s problems that satisfies the needs and desires of everyone involved, including the street’s families and the taxpayers.

Part of that solution may involve having King’s company pay the county back for whatever money it spends to repair the road, which would involve digging out a 20-foot by 30-foot section of road and laying down new asphalt.

Pope said paving supplies for this project could cost $1,200, but he won’t be sure about a total price until the weather clears and his crews can study it further.

“I’ll try to work with them and solve the problem,” King said. “I’ll work with the county, whatever we need to do. ... if I’m the only one who caused the problem.”

But while King’s willing to work with the highway department, he said something else is behind the issue other than damaged pavement and 80,000-pound logging trucks that haven’t been down the street for a year.

“It’s just straight politics,” King said, summing up the controversy. “Some people, they just try to play the politics and get one group of commissioners against the others.”

| (276) 645-2518

Advertisement

 
View More: No tags are associated with this article
Not what you're looking for? Try our quick search:
 

Advertisement

Reader Reactions

Flag Comment Posted by Golddigger on April 14, 2009 at 12:25 am

Dwight King is building himself a reputation, a reputation that will do him in as a commissioner. A lot of the voters in Piney Flats are disappointed with King. If Marvin Hyatt should run again, King will be history. You can fool some of the people some of the time, but you can’t fool all the people all the time.

Flag Comment Posted by Big Mouth on April 13, 2009 at 9:03 pm

Sounds like Uncle Cleatis and the other resident Karla Toler knows what they are talking about. Anyone with good common sense wouldn’t vote for a commissioner that’s irresponsible such as Dwight King. Now everyone knows his true color.

Flag Comment Posted by Uncle Cleatis on April 13, 2009 at 8:50 pm

Commissioner Dwight King can try and avoid this situation all he wants, but I know the facts. I’ve lived on Stanfield Road for a long time and use this road daily. When they started running these logging trucks on Stanfield Road, you could see the road start to crumble with large tracks embedded in it. Dwight King and Volunteer Logging is responsible for damaging our road that it took us 26 years to get built. I know that Elsie Thompson gave the right of way to build the road 26 years ago, then the county couldn’t get right of way to finish about a quarter mile. We finally got the rest of the road widened in the fall of 2006. Mr. Pope and his employees paved the road in the spring of 2007. Dwight King damaged the road in early spring of 2008. Dwight King will never get my vote again. He represents my district and I can’t imagine a commissioner that
goes against the welfare of the people he represents.

Flag Comment Posted by BABYDOLL on April 07, 2009 at 9:49 pm

The fact is, Karla Toler got it right.
Stanfield road was in good condition until King started running his logging trucks on it and destroyed the road bed with all of that weight. Some of the residents say King should pay for fixing the road and I agree.

Flag Comment Posted by poohbear on April 07, 2009 at 4:49 pm

Norton I did not hear anyone claiming they knew how to build but I have enough COMMON SENSE to know that WATER DOES NOT RUN UP HILL, and it had to go somewhere, it’s very evident that you are a POPE supporter and are bent on blaming King, but you have never answered the question why was only the lower portion of Stanfield Rd that was built by POPE messed up and not the rest of it and he spent twice as much time on the other side of Timber Ridge logging and going out that way yet there was no damage done to that road.

Flag Comment Posted by muddymess on April 07, 2009 at 2:59 pm

Get your facts straight.  Land was taken from property owners on the Toler side of the road.  The way the land was used, (or misused)is wholy the responsibility of the county. (Does anyone other than me remember the large trees that were cut down on that side of the road?)  Does it not make sense that running water that has no ditch to run in would cause the edges of the roadbed to erode in turn causing the road to crumble when driven on by cars or heaven forbid logging trucks or schoolbuses? It’s a ROAD and should hold up to being driven on! The county should have spent more time evaluating the lay of the land before building a road that is evidently not going to hold up.  Again, the drainage and standing water issues should have been addressed in the engineering phase before the road was built instead everyone trying to place blame on who should be responsible now.  I’m not an engineer therefore I don’t know who’s responsible for the problems.  No where in my post did I say the logging trucks were responsible.  Someone wanted a wider road and someone got a wider road now the residents who live there get to put up with the everyday problems.

Flag Comment Posted by poohbear on April 07, 2009 at 2:52 pm

Norton apparently you do not understand there is an underground spring and water surfaces to the top all the time. The water coming off those banks and out of those steep driveways with so much force it washes the dirt and mud under and on top of the road. The sides of the road have washed so bad that the road has broken and gave way, I have seen the elderly lady mentioned in the previous comment out trying to get the mud that was a foot deep out of her driveway and it came from the other side. Lets face it the county did a very poor job and they want someone else to take the blame. Like I said don’t you find it strange that only the later portion of Stanfield Road is torn up and no damage was done to the rest of it nor any damage to Timber Ridge Rd?

Flag Comment Posted by muddymess on April 07, 2009 at 8:35 am

I would like to take issue with several of the comments in the article.  First of all, there were no personal relationships regarding my parents and the issue of building the road.  My father has been deceased since 2003 and my mother was basically told “the road is going to be built whether you like it or not, this is our offer, take it or leave it.  She was paid enough to have the current fence build along the road. 

Very soon after the road was finished, a large pothold formed at the top of the hill,  I have been told for years that there is a wet weather spring there.  You would think that the engineers envolved would have addressed that issue and had a drainage tile placed under the road before it was constructed.  Now there is just a reforming hole that has to be patched.  You can see the water forming on the road, but to date the problem has not been, they just keep putting “bandaids” on the real problem by filling in the hole. 

We had to complain numerous times about the drainage issues.  The ditches constructed were very shallow and could not handle the runoff. Can you imagine my anger when I went to visit my mother, who was 78 at the time and has now passed away, and found her with the water hose, cleaning out red clay mud from her driveway and garage.  Again instead of repairing the problem, the county poured a barrier at the end of her driveway.  But the river of muddy water still pours down the road. The banks along the road are bare with no erosion control.  The problem has gotton so bad that the fence posts at the top of the bank are becoming exposed and the bank has caved into the ditch.  This was brought to the county’s attention in November, however again nothing has been done to repair the problems.

  There is no posted speedlimit on the road and it seems to be the local passtime to see how fast people can get from the Elizabethton Highway to the end of Stanfield road.  Cars and motorcycles speed up and down the road with no consideration of the people who live on the road and have to pull out on it to get out of their driveways.  There are several blind spots and unless something is done to control the speed it’s just going to be a matter of time before someone get’s hit.  There is is blind spot at the top of the hill where I share a driveway to the barn with another landowner.  Everytime I pull out I just have to hope no one is speeding up the hill. The county might want to consider placing some “hidden entrance” signs in the bad spots and deciding a safe speed limit to post and enforce.

If the county is aware of a “leaking water main” just how long to they plan to let it continue leaking?

Flag Comment Posted by poohbear on April 07, 2009 at 8:27 am

Has anyone noticed a NO TRUCK SIGN posted anywhere on Stanfield Road I sure haven’t I just thought it was open to all the PUBLIC since I saw a Sullivan County School Bus running on that road, Oh I guess I shouldn’t have said that next thing you know they will want the school system to help pay for the road repair. I looked up the weight on school buses and the weight is 7 tons with no children wonder what that weight would do the the already poorly paved road?

Flag Comment Posted by poohbear on April 06, 2009 at 4:57 pm

I wonder if Mrs. Toler is the person that expects the county to come along and scrape all the mud that comes from her bank into the road, her yard and the side of her driveway washes so bad that it looks like one big mud slide on Stanfields road when it rains, no wonder she paved her driveway it had ruts in it 2 feet deep where it had washed so bad but I guess that was Mr. Kings fault too. This is the kind of thing you expect from a new comer to the community, those of us that have lived her all our life knows just what a problem Stanfield road has been for years.

Post a Comment(Requires free registration)

The commenting period has ended or commenting has been deactivated for this article.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement