Bluff City’s Photo Enforcement Cameras Coming Soon

» 19 Comments | Post a Comment

BLUFF CITY, Tenn. – As city officials chose the company they want to provide speed-enforcement cameras, Police Chief David Nelson said Thursday it will be at least four months before the devices are installed along a 2-mile section of U.S. 11E.

In a 4-1 vote, the Bluff City Board of Mayor and Aldermen chose American Traffic Systems to serve as its camera vendor. The company provides traffic-enforcement cameras to 150 communities in the United States and Canada, company spokesman Josh Weiss said.

“The whole point of photo enforcement is to modify driver behavior,” Weiss said. Overall, Weiss said, his company’s traffic cameras have resulted in 40 percent to 50 percent drops in traffic violations and a 30 percent drop in crashes.

Nelson and other city officials said they’d like to see similar results along the section of U.S. 11E that runs from Pardner’s Bar-B-Que and Steak Restaurant to the Piney Flats Crossroads.

The heavily traveled stretch is plagued with speeders, Nelson said Thursday, citing results of a traffic study he asked Bristol Tennessee Traffic Engineer David Metzger to conduct for the city in January.

According to the study, 114,991 vehicles passed between Pardner’s and the Crossroads between Jan. 9 and Jan. 14. Their average speed was 47.9 mph, about 3 mph over the limit for that part of U.S. 11E.

But the study also showed that almost 9 percent of those drivers were doing at least 10 mph over of the limit: 10,336 of them were doing 55 mph or higher; 143 were doing more than 65 mph; and 12 were doing 75 mph or more.

In the past, Nelson said, he’s assigned one of his officers to patrol this strip of highway on a 24-hour basis. But after the board cut the police force from 10 officers to eight when it passed its budget this summer, Nelson said he’s no longer been able to do that. That’s why he’s looking at cameras, he said.

In December, Nelson and Alderman Don Weaver introduced the idea of putting speed cameras on U.S. 11E, especially when it comes to the 45-mph zone between Pardner’s and the Crossroads.

Many of the business owners on that highway have been complaining about the speeders, Weaver said Thursday. The city had to do something to ease these concerns, he said, because “most of our taxes come from that area.”

On April 10, the board approved, in a 4-1 vote, the resolution allowing the use of traffic enforcement cameras to catch speeders and people who run red lights in the city. But Weaver said the current proposal covers only the 45 mph section of U.S. 11E. It does not include putting cameras downtown, Weaver said, attempting to contradict rumors to the contrary he said were spreading through town.

Aldermen Melvin Carrier cast Thursday’s lone vote against choosing American Traffic Systems to supply the cameras. Carrier also cast the only dissenting vote at the board’s April 10 meeting.

“A lot of citizens I’ve talked to say they don’t want [the cameras],” Carrier said Thursday. “I mean, every citizen I’ve talked to.”

Both times a vote on the cameras has come up, Carrier has tried to delay the decision until after the city’s May 19 election, when voters will cast ballots for mayor and three of the board’s five seats.

One candidate in the election, Robert Miller, has made speed cameras an issue for his campaign. At the April 10 meeting, Miller asked whether the city was “turning to the cameras because of the downturn in the economy.”

Miller also asked whether the city would be charged anything if the cameras did not produce enough money.

Weiss said Thursday there are no minimum amounts specified in the contract his company has with its municipal partners.

Nelson said developing that contract is the next hurdle city officials must overcome in their quest to put the cameras in place. He said the city’s attorney will meet with American Traffic Systems’ attorney to nail down the details. That would include determining how much of the $90 in fines and court costs would go to Weiss’ company.

Once they’ve finalized the agreement and voted on it, city officials and American Traffic Systems will have to get the permits needed for the cameras from the Tennessee Department of Transportation, Nelson said, estimating the entire process could take four to five months.

| (276) 645-2518

Advertisement

 
View More: No tags are associated with this article
Not what you're looking for? Try our quick search:
 

Advertisement

Reader Reactions

Flag Comment Posted by evaningstar on April 24, 2009 at 10:44 am

Does anyone know the accident statistics for this stretch of road, not counting the intersection where the redlights were just installed.

Flag Comment Posted by Bj the Dj on April 24, 2009 at 10:41 am

The article stated 10,336 vehicles were traveling 55 mph or higher. 143 were traveling 65 mph or higher, thats 20 mph over the speed limit.  Thats ridiculous, there is no reason to drive that fast on a busy roadway that is lined with businesses and peoples homes.  It only takes one of them to cause a crash and injuries to someone coming out of a business or home. It is a proven fact that the higher the speed is in an accident, the greater risk there is for serious injuries.  Everyone is in such a hurry to get nowhere.  If the cameras can slow drivers down, I am all for it. 
Please, Drivers slow down before another innocent life is lost.  It could be a member of your family.

Flag Comment Posted by evaningstar on April 24, 2009 at 9:43 am

I do travel that road extensively, not at that time of morning though. And I have always thought the traffic was an issue but based on that study it doesn’t support the need for cameras. The number of speeders in relevance to the amount of traffic is rather low according to the study.

Flag Comment Posted by Bj the Dj on April 24, 2009 at 9:38 am

Apparently you do not travel the same 11E that I do everyday if you don’t see speeding as a problem.  Try driving to Johnson City from Bristol between 6am and 7am doing the speed limit and see how many drivers blow by you cutting in and out of traffic.  And if you notice, it is the same drivers you see everyday who think they own the road. It’s funny to, you always catch up with them at a traffic light.  Everyone knows the officers keep a close eye on the 45 mph zone, and when you enter the Johnson City limits but not the rest of the road.  It’s time for Bristol to consider cameras on their section of 11E also.  And of course the revenue is a major influence for them.  Every city and town is looking for a way to increase revenue, so obey the traffic laws and you do not pay.

Flag Comment Posted by Pete Pooter on April 24, 2009 at 9:16 am

Dr. Hooker—-I agree with you. Some drivers speed out of habit, they just drive too fast ALL of the Time. I drove from Johnson City to Bluff City yesterday evening about 5:00 and I drove the 45 m.p.h. speed limit. Every auto in front of me moved on and left me while all drivers behind me passed me. People on this section of 11-E just have a desire for speed it seems.
Some folks can say the speed cameras are for revenue only but I totally disagree. THE LIFE WE SAVE JUST MIGHT BE OUR OWN.

Flag Comment Posted by Dr. Hooker on April 24, 2009 at 8:57 am

I say go for the speed cameras. If these cameras save just one life, they would be very worth while. It’s not a pretty sight to see a person arrive at the emergency room that has been in an auto accident and in a life or death situation. It happens every minute of the day somewhere across the United States due to speeding or wreckless driving. Speed cameras make it hurt for a little while, but eventually the drivers know they are present and they learn to respect the law !!!!!

Flag Comment Posted by Jeff Hise on April 24, 2009 at 8:38 am

Safety should be the number item here , but it’s not. It’s all about the money. I travel 11E two or more times a day. I don’t see speeding as the towns leaders say because Bluff City is on the national speed trap list and is well known by locals as a trap. I will say this, I won’t spend a dine in Bluff City, as well as Kingsport, Jonesboro, Church Hill and Johnson City. So have fun with the camras boys and girls, as I spend what little money I have left after all the other taxes , some where else. PS HAVE A GOOD DAY.

Flag Comment Posted by evaningstar on April 24, 2009 at 8:37 am

After the traffic study was done…I dont’ see that big of a speed issue. If you take the number of speeders in average the number isn’t that high. I would have thought it would have been more. Out of 115K drivers only about 150 were speeding more than 10mph. That is not exactly alot. And the ones that are doing only 10mph over…everyone does that on most roads..even roads where the speed limit is 25. Try to drive around on Windsor and Broad streets in Bristol, where the percentages of speeders are triple what is in this study. I don’t think these numbers warrant the cameras and I was in favor of them before this.

Flag Comment Posted by Uncle Cleatis on April 24, 2009 at 8:21 am

First of all, Melvin Carrier is against anything this board wants to do. Carrier is against all of these people not from a business viewpoint, but from a personal vendetta. Carrier is sorry as they come when it comes to city leadership. He wants to get Lon Gene Leonard elected as mayor, O’Dell and Miller elected as alderman which is not going to happen. It has been rumored that Lon Gene Leonard was taking food items from Jacobs Creek Job Corp when he worked there and was asked to resign. Who would want this caliber person serving as their mayor?

Post a Comment(Requires free registration)

The commenting period has ended or commenting has been deactivated for this article.
 

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement